- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
预见性护理在氧驱雾化吸入治疗小儿支气管哮喘护理中应用
预见性护理在氧驱雾化吸入治疗小儿支气管哮喘护理中应用
[摘要] 目的 探析预见性护理在氧驱雾化吸入治疗小儿支气管哮喘护理中的应用。方法 采取随机法选择该院儿科2013年9月―2015年9月接收的100例小儿支气管哮喘病患(实验组),该组选择氧驱雾化吸入治疗+预见性护理;同期选择100例小儿支气管哮喘病患(对照组)作对照,选择氧驱雾化吸入治疗+常规护理,通过全方位分析、观察所有患儿的预后情况以及治疗情况,同时对其有效率、不良症状发生率、依从性以及护理满意程度等指标进行客观对比。 结果 该研究的所有入选患儿中,护理后实验组入选患儿有效率98.00%,对照组98.00%;实验组入选患儿中有7例(7.00%)出现不良症状,对照组中有22例(22.00%)出现不良症状;实验组入选患儿家长的护理工作满意度99.00%,对照组83.00%;实验组入选患儿依从性94.00%,对照组80.00%,2组对比有差距(P0.05)。结论 预见性护理在氧驱雾化吸入治疗小儿支气管哮喘护理中的应用效果显著,有效率高,减少不良反应发生,提高家属满意率,值得应用。
[Abstract] Objective To investigate the effect of predictive nursing applied to bronchial asthma in children treated by oxygen-driving atomization inhalation. Methods 100 children with bronchial asthma admitted in Department of Pediatrics of our hospital from September 2013 to September 2015 were randomly selected as the experimental group treated by oxygen-driving atomization inhalation and predictive nursing, and other 100 children with bronchial asthma admitted during the same period were selected as the control group treated by oxygen-driving atomization inhalation and conventional nursing. The prognosis and treatment of the two ups were analyzed comprehensively. The response rate, incidence of adverse reactions, compliance and level of satisfaction with nursing of the two groups were compared objectively. Results After nursing intervention, the response rate was 98.00%, 73.00% respectively in the experimental group and the control group with statistically significant difference (P0.05). 7 cases (7.00%) in the experimental group had adverse reactions, while 22 cases (22.00%) in the control group had adverse reactions, the difference in the incidence of adverse reactions between the two groups was statistically significant (P0.05). The level of satisfaction with nursing was 99.00%, 83.00% in the parents of the children in the experimental group and the control group, respectively with statistically significant difference (P0.05). The compliance was 94.00%, 80.00%, respectively in the experime
文档评论(0)