- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
Hartmann术式与支架植入手术切除一期吻合术式治疗左半结肠癌并肠梗阻临床对比研究
Hartmann术式与支架植入手术切除一期吻合术式治疗左半结肠癌并肠梗阻临床对比研究
【摘要】 目的 探讨Hartmann术式和支架植入手术切除一期吻合术式治疗左半结肠癌并肠梗阻的临床疗效差异。方法 150例左半结肠癌并肠梗阻患者随机分为对照组和观察组, 各75例, 分别采用Hartmann术式和支架植入手术切除一期吻合术式治疗, 比较两组患者临床受益评分, 术后肛门排气时间、住院时间、术后并发症发生情况、术后转移率及5年生存率等。结果 观察组患者临床受益评分显著高于对照组, 差异有统计学意义(Plt;0.05);观察组患者住院时间显著短于对照组, 差异有统计学意义(Plt;0.05);两组患者术后肛门排气时间、并发症发生率比较差异无统计学意义(Pgt;0.05);观察组患者术后转移率显著低于对照组, 差异有统计学意义(Plt;0.05);两组患者5年生存率比较差异无统计学意义(Pgt;0.05)。结论 支架植入手术切除一期吻合术式治疗左半结肠癌并肠梗阻可有效提高临床受益评分, 加快术后康复进程, 并降低术后转移风险, 疗效优于Hartmann术式。
【关键词】 Hartmann术式;支架植入;一期吻合;左半结肠癌;肠梗阻
DOI:10.14163/j.cnki.11-5547/r.2015.04.012
Clinical comparative research between Hartmann operation and stent implantation excision primary anastomosis operation in the treatment of left hemicolon carcinoma complicated with intestinal obstruction ZHANG Mao-sheng. Shandong Longkou City Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Longkou 265701, China
【Abstract】 Objective To investigate clinical effect differences between Hartmann operation and stent implantation excision primary anastomosis operation in the treatment of left hemicolon carcinoma complicated with intestinal obstruction. Methods A total of 150 patients with left hemicolon carcinoma complicated with intestinal obstruction were randomly divided into control group and observation group, with 75 cases in each group. Hartmann operation and stent implantation excision primary anastomosis operation were applied respectively in the two groups, and comparisons were made on clinical benefit scores, postoperative anal exhaust times, hospital stays, postoperative complications, postoperative metastasis rate, and survival rate in 5 years. Results The observation group had higher clinical benefit scores than the control group, and the difference had statistical significance (Plt;0.05). The observation group had shorter hospital stays than the control group, and the difference had statistical significance (Plt;0.05). There was no statistically significant difference of incidence of posto
原创力文档


文档评论(0)