- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
高粘度骨水泥与传统PVP及PKP治疗椎体压缩性骨折护理分析
高粘度骨水泥与传统PVP及PKP治疗椎体压缩性骨折护理分析
[摘要] 目的 研究高粘度骨水泥与传统PVP及PKP治疗椎体压缩性骨折的护理要点。方法 便利选择该院于2014年1月―2015年10月?g收治的100例因骨质疏松导致椎体压缩性骨折的患者,按照随机数字表法将患者划分为观察组与对照组各50例,为观察组患者提供高粘度骨水泥经皮椎体成形术(PVP)治疗,为对照组提供低粘度骨水泥经皮椎体成形术(PVP)治疗,评价两组患者术后椎体渗漏率、疼痛评分及生活质量评分。结果 观察组患者再骨折4.00%(2例)、骨折椎体渗漏率0.00%(0例)均优于对照组14.00%(7例)、6.00%(3例)(χ2=6.105, 6.186, P0.05);末次随访时再次测评结果提示观察组患者疼痛评分优于对照组(t=54.216,P0.05)。观察组患者治疗后活动能力、精力、睡眠质量、情绪等生活质量指标评分均优于对照组(t=38.655、31.578、41.502、39.191,P0.05)。 结论 采用高粘度骨水泥PVP治疗椎体压缩性骨折患者,取得较好疗效,有效缓解患者椎体疼痛,提高生活质量,降低并发症发生率。
[关键词] PVP;PKP;骨水泥;骨质疏松;椎体骨折
[中图分类号] R687 [文献标识码] A [文章编号] 1674-0742(2018)03(a)-0150-03
Clinical Observation of High Viscosity of Bone Cement during the Traditional PVP and PKP
ZHANG Li-xia, LI Hong-ying, ZHANG Hui, LUO Shi-ying, ZHANG Yu-shan
Department of Orthopedics, Heyuan Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Heyuan, Guangdong Province, 517000 China
[Abstract] Objective This paper tries to analyze the clinical application of high viscosity of bone cement during the traditional PVP and PKP. Methods 100 patients with vertebral compression fracture induced by osteoporosis treated from January 2014 to October 2015 in this hospital were convenient selected. The subjects were randomly divided into two groups, with 50 cases each group. The observation group took the high viscosity of bone cement during the PVP therapy. The control group took the low viscosity of bone cement during the PVP therapy. The vertebral leakage rate, pain scores and life quality index were evaluated. Results The rate of repeated fracture and vertebral leakage for observation group was 4.00% (2 cases) and 0.00% (0 case); the rate for control group was 14.00% (7 cases) and 6.00% (3 cases) (χ2=6.105, 6.186, P0.05); during the last follow-up visit, the pain score for observation group was better than control group (t=54.216, P0.05); the life quality index like activity of daily living, energy, sleeping quality, emotion for observation group were better than control group (t=38.655
文档评论(0)