对韩国高中汉语教材的分析及改进设想-汉语言文字学专业论文.docxVIP

II II 摘 要 与中国人的母语“习得”不同的是外国人的汉语“学习”必须在具体的基准与规划下有系 统地进行。在以课堂学习为主之韩国的汉语教育现况下，教科书可以说是汉语教授与学习之唯 一的基准。因此汉语教育是否具有系统性和科学性是必须从探讨教科书的系统上着手的。本文 在国内的相关文献的基础上，对韩国高中汉语教材进行调研，将教材的主要内容分为文学作品 部分、语法部分、文化教学部分和写作部分加以分析。通过分析，我们发现，1.韩国教育部批 准的六本教材之间没有统一的规格，存在着比较大的区别；2.大部分教材的单元构成缺乏有机 的统一性，如文学作品、文化教学、写作领域之间没有紧密的连贯性；3.教材的构成偏向于某 一方面，如文学作品的体裁偏重于古诗等古代文学，语法部分的语气助词和动态助词的比率不 平衡等。对于上述发现，笔者参考中国对外汉语教学大纲等相关文献的要求进一步反思教材存 在的缺点，最后探索如何对现行教材进行改进。 关键词：教材对比；分析设想；实际运用 III III South Korean high school Chinese textbooks on analysis and improvement ideas Jin Junhe (Chinese Language and Literature) Directed by Professor Liu Jingjian Abstract And the Chinese language acquisition are foreigners of different Chinese learning must be specific benchmarks and planning carried out under the system. Mainly in the classroom learning the status of Chinese education in Korea, the textbook can be said that the only Chinese language teaching and learning benchmarks. Therefore, whether the Chinese system of scientific education is necessary on the system from the start of the textbook. This article in the country on the basis of the relevant literature on the Korean high school Chinese teaching materials to conduct research, to teaching literature is divided into the main part, the syntax part of the culture of teaching and writing some parts of analysis. Through analysis, we found that 1. South Korean Ministry of Education approved the six there is no uniform standard among textbooks, there are large differences; 2. Most of the organic material of the cell constitutes a lack of unity, such as literature, culture, teaching, writing area is not close coherence between; 3. tend to one aspect of the composition of materials, such as the emphasis on the genre of literary works of ancient poetry and other literature, grammar, part of the modal particle and dynamic imbalance in the ratio of particle. For the above findings, the author refer to the Chinese foreign language syllabus and other relevant literature calls for further re