- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
罗哌卡因复合舒芬太尼在硬膜外麻醉无痛分娩中的临床观察.doc
罗哌卡因复合舒芬太尼在硬膜外麻醉无痛分 娩中的临床观察
[ ]H的研究罗哌卡因复合舒芬太尼在硬膜外麻醉分娩镇痛的 安全性及有效性。方法随机选择96例初产临产妇,以入产房的单双 例分为两组:A组注入0.2%罗哌卡因与5 ug舒芬太尼混合液6mL,后 接硬膜外?子止痛泵维持剂量7mL/h (n=48例);B组为普通分娩对照 组(n=48例)。观察两组分娩过程的疼痛分级和胎儿评分,产妇的血 压心率变化,产妇的VAS评分,产程时间,顺产率,产后尿潴留等情 况。结果疼痛分级效果镇痛组显著优于对照组(P〈0. 01),产程时间 长于镇痛组,差异有显著性意义(P〈0.05); B组产妇在产程中MAP、 IIR明显升高,变化有明显差异(P〈0.05); A组剖腹产率比普通组低 (P0. 05);缩宫素使用率、围生期出血、Apgar评分、产后尿潴留等 比较两组无明显差异(P〉0. 05)。结论罗哌卡因复合舒芬太尼在硬膜 外用于分娩镇痛可以降低分娩时期的疼痛,提高舒适度和安全性。
,供学习和研宄 使用, 和著作权归原 所有, 如果需耍分享,
请保留本段说明
[关键词]无痛分娩;罗哌卡因;舒芬太尼;硬膜外麻醉
[ ]R614 [ ]A [ ]2095-0616
(2017) 07-134-04
Clinical observation of ropivacainc combined with
sufentanil in painless delivor epidural anesthesia
CHEN Changliang CHEN Yuansheng
Department of Anesthesiology , Qingyuan Hospital of
Ttraditional Chinese Medicine, Guangdong, Qingyuan 511500,
China
[Abstract] Objective To explore the safety and
effectiveness of ropivacaine combined with sufentanil in
painless delivor epidural anesthesia. Methods 96 cases of
primipara were randomly selected and divided into two groups
according to single and double cases in delivery room. Patients
in group A were treated with injection of 0.2% ropivacaine and
5 u g sufentanil mixture 6mL, and then maintenance dose of
epidural analgesia pump 7mL/h (n=48) . Patients in group B were
treated with general delivery (n=48) . Pain classification and
fetal outcome during delivery, maternal blood pressure and
heart rate changes, maternal VAS score, labor time, labor rate,
postpartum urinary retention and so on of the two group were
observed. Results The analgesic effect of pain grade group was significantly better than that of control group (P0. 01) . The
labor time was longer than that in the analgesia group, and the
difference was significant (P0. 05) . The MAP and HR were
significantly higher in the group B, and the changes were
significantly different (P0. 05) . The caesarean section rate
of group A was l ower than that of normal group (P0. 05) . There was no significant difference between the two gr
您可能关注的文档
最近下载
- 2025年教学查房——高血压.pptx VIP
- 山西省2026届高三第一次八省联考语文(T8联考)(含答案).pdf VIP
- 2026五个带头发言材料三.docx VIP
- 新能源汽车行业产业人才需求分析报告.docx
- 广西急难型、支出型临时救助审核认定表、申请社会救助家庭经济状况核对授权书、告知书、领取表.docx VIP
- 一年级上册语文期末复习-看拼音写词语4_苏教版.doc VIP
- 2026年成都农商银行软件开发岗(应用架构方向)社会招聘10人备考题库(含答案详解).docx VIP
- 培智生活数学五年级上册教案人民教育出版社.pdf VIP
- 2025北京海淀初一(上)期末生物(含答案).pdf VIP
- 天坛的介绍课件.pptx VIP
原创力文档


文档评论(0)