化斑汤治疗炎性痤疮临床疗效观察-中医外科学专业论文.docxVIP

成都中医药大学硕士学位论文 成都中医药大学硕士学位论文 PAGE PAGE 10 中文摘要 目的：系统观察化斑汤治疗炎性痤疮的临床疗效。 方法：将 120 例炎性痤疮患者随机分为治疗组和对照组,每组各 60 例，治疗组内服化斑汤，对照组内服复方珍珠暗疮片，并且两组 均外用克林霉素磷酸酯凝胶。每周复诊，观察各组患者症状积分的 变化，连续观察 4 周，疗程结束后对积分进行统计学分析，判定疗 效。 结果：两组患者疗效分别为：治疗组痊愈率 48.28%、愈显率 87.27%、总有效率 98.28%；对照组痊愈率 29.09%、愈显率 67.27%、 总有效率 85.45%。治疗组与对照组比较，在总有效率、临床症状等 方面，均有显著性差异（P0.05）。 结论：治疗炎性痤疮，内服化斑汤疗效优于复方珍珠暗疮片， 不良反应少，具有临床推广价值。 关键词：炎性痤疮 化斑汤 复方珍珠暗疮片 克林霉素磷酸酯凝 胶 Abstract Objective: systematically observe the effect of HuaBan decoction to treat with inflammatory acne. Methods: 120 cases of inflammatory acne are randomly divided into the treatment group and the control group, each group has 60 patients. The treatment group takes the HuaBan decoction, while the control group takes Fufang Zhenzhu tablets. Meanwhile, both groups use clindamycin phosphate gel as adjuvant therapy. Patients return visit each week. During this process, researches observe patients’ changes of symptom score. After four weeks, make the statistical analysis of the score and compare the effect at the end of the treatment. Results: the effect of the two groups: (1) the treatment group cure rate is 48.28%, and the total effective rate is 98.28 %.(2) The control Groupthe cure rate is 29.09%, and the total effective rate is 85.45%. In the total effective rate, integral and clinical symptoms, etc, the treatment group and control group have no significant difference (P 0.05) . Conclusion: For inflammatory acne,the treatment of HuaBan decoction has less adverse reaction and more clinical application value which is better than Fufang Zhenzhu Anchuang tablets. Keywords: Inflammatory acne, HuaBan decoction, Fufang Zhenzhu Anchuang tablets, Clindamycin Phosphate Gel 目 录 HYPERLINK \l _bookmark0 中文摘要 2 HYPERLINK \l _bookmark1 英文缩略词表 8 HYPERLINK \l _bookmark2 引言 9 HYPERLINK \l _bookmark3 第一部分 临床研究 10 HYPERLINK \l _bookmark4 1 研究目的 10 HYPERLINK \l _bookmark5 2 研究资料 10 HYPERLINK \l _bookmark6 2.1 研究对象 10 HYPERLINK \l _bookmark7 2.2 诊断标准 10 HYPERLINK \l