京城首例开瓶费案引发的法律问题思考-法律·民商法专业论文.docxVIP

京城首例开瓶费案引发的法律问题思考-法律·民商法专业论文.docx

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
京城首例开瓶费案引发的法律问题思考-法律·民商法专业论文

兰州大学硕上学位论文 兰州大学硕上学位论文 京城首例开瓶费案引发的法律问题思考 Abstract In the modem market economy,consumers have the right to choose their favorite goods and services and operators to arrange their operating modes and offer services within legal regulations.When the mutual interests are against each other, law is bound to make certain considerations and choices between them.However,as our current law has no clear regulations on such cases,the court decisions on similar cases are sometimes quite opposite.So in the current legal environment,it is necessary to give a clear legal definition whether the”No bring your own drinks,”and the”Open bottle fee”are reasonable or not.Taking the Beijing’S first corkage Case as an example,this thesis aims to have in-depth discussion and analysis on the issues: the legality and legitimacy of the regulmion on corkage fee,the functions and limitations of government intervention and industry regulations,public opinions’ influence on judicial activities and the attitudes of the judiciary. The thesis consists of four chapters: Chapter one is a comprehensive introduction of the Beijing’s corkage case, including the main disputes,and the results of the first and second court decisions. Chapter two makes a comprehensive assessment on the verdict reasons,the law applicability,the parties’controversy about the court decision,the he trial courts’ delicate change of attitudes on corkage fee.In addition,a further analysis is given about the pros and cons of the law applicability and justice—oriented functions of the two court decisions. Chapter three discusses the legality of the restaurants”single actions of‘No bring drinks’’and“Open boric fee”and presents possible exceptions. Chapter four discusses the issues conceming resolution mechanisms on similar cases and perfection of OUr legal systems from the angles of the functions and limitations of government intervention and industry regulation

您可能关注的文档

文档评论(0)

peili2018 + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档