两种风险评估模型在多个行业职业健康风险评估的应用.docxVIP

两种风险评估模型在多个行业职业健康 风险评估的应用 周莉芳张美辨邹华袁伟明全长健 浙江省疾病预防控制中心 摘要： R的评价新加坡风险评估模型和罗马尼亚风险评估模型在职业健康风险评估应 用的适用性。方法 应用2种风险评估模型对造纸、化工和电镀行业重点岗位进 行风险评估，采用风险比值比较不同行业职业健康风险，并与职业接触限值、职 业病危害作业分级和文献报道进行比较。结果新加坡风险评估模型评估结果显 示，造纸行业风险等级为低,等风险，风险比值为0. 42±0. 04;化工行业风险等 级为可忽略低风险，风险比值为0. 31±0. 10;电镀行业风险等级为低槪高风险， 风险比值为0. 62±0. 15o罗马尼亚风险评估模型评估结果显示，造纸行业风险 等级为低綜风险，风险比值为0. 46±0. 13;化工行业风险等级为最低低风险，风 险比值为0. 38±0. 08;电镀行业风险等级为低年常高风险，风险比值为 0. 52±0. 11。化工和造纸行业风险比值差异无统计学意义(P0. 05),电镀行业 风险比值高于化工行业(P0. 05) ;2种模型评估所得风险比值差异无统计学意 义(P0. 05) o造纸、化工和电镀行业场所空气中化学物浓度超标率分别为 0.00%、7. 70%和8.00%。结论 新加坡风险评估模型和罗马尼亚风险评估模型均 适用于造纸、化工和电镀等行业职业健康风险评估，风险评估结果基木一致。 关键词： 风险评估;职业健康;新加坡风险评估模型;罗马尼亚风险评估模型; 作者简介：周莉芳，硕士，主管医师，主要从事职业卫生研究工作 作者简介：张美辨，E-nia订:mbzhang@cdc. zj. cn 收稿日期：2017-06-21 基金：浙江省卫生高层次创新人才培养工程项目 Application of two hea1th risk assessment models in the occupational hea 1th risk assessment of chemicals in different industries ZHOU Li-fang ZHANG Mei-bian ZOU Hua YUAN Wei-ming QUAN Chang-jian Zhejiang Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention; Abstract： Objective To explore the applicability of Singapore semi-quantiteitive risk assessment mode wind Romania risk assessment model in occupational health risk assessment. Methods We employed two risk assessment models to evaluate the risk of key positions in papermaking factories, electroplating factories, and chemical factories. Then we compared the resul ts with occupational exposure limits, classification of occupational hazards and literature reports. Results The results of Singapore model showed that the total risk ratio was 0. 40 ±0. 16. The risk levels of papermaking factories, electroplating factories, and chemical factories were low-medium, negligible-low and low-very high, respectively. The risk ratio of three industries were 0. 42±0. 04, 0. 31 ±0. 10 cind 0. 62±0. 15. The results of Romania model showed that the total risk ratio wasO- 43 ±0. 11. The risk levels of papermaking factorics, electroplating factories, and chemical factories were respectively low-high,