护理干预对冠心病心绞痛发生率的影响分析.docVIP

护理干预对冠心病心绞痛发生率的影响分析.doc

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
护理干预对冠心病心绞痛发生率的影响分 析 doi: 10. 3969/j. issn. 1007_614x. 2014. 9. 74 摘要目的:探讨不同护理干预法对冠心病心绞痛发生 率的影响分析。方法:收治冠心病心绞痛患者168例,按计 划分为两组,每组84例,分别予以综合护理干预法(观察 组)和传统护理法(对照组),比较两组护理后恢复疗效和 患者及家属满意度情况。结果:观察组再次发作心绞痛(25%) 明显低于对照组(58.3%),住院时间(14天)明显少于对照 组(23天),护理后观察组心率(70. 6±11.8次/分)明显 少于对照组(94.3±12.2次/分),患者及家属非常满意 (88.1%)明显高于对照组(47.6%)。结论:综合护理干预 法对于冠心病心绞痛发生率影响明显,恢复效果好,患者及 家属满意度高。 关键词综合护理干预法传统护理法冠心病心绞痛 Influence of nursing intervention on the incidence of coronary heart disease and angina pectoris Zhao Fengxian , Li Chunli The Xinjiang infantry regiment of the seventh division 123 regiment hospital, 833208 Abstract Objective: To analyze the effects of different nursing intervention on the incidence of coronary heart disease and angina pectoris. Methods: From 2009 June to 2011 June in our hospital 168 patients with angina pectoris, according to plan, divided into 2 groups, 84 cases in each group , were given comprehensive nursing intervention method in our hospital ( observation group ) and the traditional nursing method (control group), compared 2 groups of patients after curative effect and nursing satisfaction of patients and their families the situation. Results: The observation group again angina (25%) was significantly lower than the control group (58. 3% ), hospitalization time ( 14 days ) was significantly less than that of the control group (23 days), the heart rate after the treatment (70. 6+11. 8 beats/min) was significantly less than that of the control group (94. 3 + 12.2beats/min), very satisfied with the patients and their family members (88.1%) was significantly higher than that of the control group (47. 6% ) . Conclusion : Comprehensive hospital care intervention for angina pectoris of coronary heart disease incidence rate significantly, restore good effect , satisfaction of patients and their family members is high, suitable for clinical application. Key words Comprehensive nursing intervention; The traditional nursing method; Coronary heart disease; Angina pectoris 冠

文档评论(0)

ggkkppp + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档