美国对华“双反”措施的WTO合规性研究-国际法学专业毕业论文.docxVIP

A B A B S T R A C T F ro m 2 0 07 , th e U n ited S tates an d oth er W T O m em b ers rev ersed th e lo n g -stan d in g p olicy o f n ot im p osing countervailing duties on n on -m arket econ om ics (N M E s), w hich u sually resulted in the con current app lication of antidum p ing duties an d cou nterv ailin g duties (D oub le app lication). T h is n ew trade rem edy m easu res b ecam e th e h eav iest b u rd en faced by th e C h inese ex p ort en terp rises. C h in a con sid ers th at th e doub le application con stitu te doub le discrim in ation again st C hin a sin ce on one h an d , in th e an ti-du m p in g field ，C h in a is treated as an N M E an d all the anti-dum p in g du ties are cou nted on th e b asis o f th e d ata of th e th ird country w hich cou ld n ot reflect th e real du m p in g m argin , on th e oth er h an d ，in th e countervailin g field ，C h in a cou ld n o lon g er b e ex em p ted from th e ap p lication o f cou nterv ailin g duties as an N M E . C h in a furth er argu es th at th e d o ub le ap p lication w ill lead to d ouble rem edy b y o ffsettin g tw ic e o n th e re late d d o m e stic su b sid ie s a n d th e re fo re b re a c h th e W T O ru le s. In th e fact, th e d oub le ap p lication again st C h in a is d ifferent fro m th at ag ain st th e m ark et coun ties. T o d eterm in e w h eth er th is n ew trad e rem edy m easu re is con sisten t w ith th e related W T O ru les m u st alw ay s tak e this k ey p roblem into co n sid eratio n . A fter clarifyin g th e gen eral rules, th is article w ill fo cu s on tw o sp ecial issu es: th e p rem ise issu e, w h eth er a W T O m em b er cou ld ap p ly coun tervailin g du tie s again st an N M E an d th e k ey issu e, w h eth er th e dou b le ap p lication again st C h in a w ill lead to d ou b le rem ed y. T h e distin guish b etw een th e doub le rem edy o n th e ex p ort sub sid iary an d th e dom estic sub sid iary is th e logi