民行交叉案件诉讼处理机制研究诉讼法学专业毕业论文.docxVIP

民行交叉案件诉讼处理机制研究诉讼法学专业毕业论文.docx

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
V V Abstract The real estate case in Jiaozuo has attracted people’s widely attention to the see also of civil and administrative since 1920’s. Although we have known something about the see also and its disposing mechandize recently, we feel confused in many fields. There are several symbolic viewpoints about the concept of the see also of civil and administrative in our nation, such as:the theory of relevance、the theory of incidental、the theory of cross and the theory of concurrence, these viewpoints cut both ways. The text proposes that the see also of civil and administrative is the case in that exists civil dispute and administrative dispute which have inner relevance and need settled at the same time, and the case originates from the same fact or behavior invading civil and administrative laws at the same time. The see also of civil and administrative has a series of characteristics on plural conflicts, jurisdical relation, subject of the right of action, the form of responsibility, which distinguishes from ordinary civil case and administrative case, and makes special requirements for its action disposing mechandize. In practice, disposition in advance 、 handling separately 、 supplementary civil (administrative)action in administrative(civil) proceedings are the main disposing modes about the see also. These modes have a lot of shortages, such as:the justice and authority have been shocked, the final decision has been damaged, quit a few see also have been excluded from judicial settlement, ineffectiveness and so on. Evidently, these modes aren’t fit for the special requirements of the see also, which leads to not only the litigants’ rights can not be pretected timely and enoughly, but also running counter to the construction of harmonious society. On the other hand, the see also of civil and administrative exists all over the world widely, the countries whether the centralized, dualism judicial system or the eclectic mode have formed mature disposing me

您可能关注的文档

文档评论(0)

131****9843 + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档