美国食品法上“公认安全”物质之认定标准-法律专业毕业论文.docxVIP

美国食品法上“公认安全”物质之认定标准-法律专业毕业论文.docx

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
上海交通大学硕士学位论文摘要 上海交通大学硕士学位论文 摘要 万方数据 万方数据 细则中对“在食品中普遍使用”的地理限制,并将改后的规则保留至今; 反映了国会、法院、行政机关对第 201 条(s)款理解的差异,以及法院 在消除差异中的关键角色。 国家标准和企业标准都是技术标准,“公认安全”法律标准是二者之 间的界限。“公认安全”认定标准是该法律标准的构成要素。“公认安全” 法律标准对审查我国的食品添加剂企业标准、合理划分国家标准与企业 标准之间的界限具有借鉴意义。 关键词:公认安全,食品添加剂,企业标准 2 上海交通大学硕士学位论文ABS 上海交通大学硕士学位论文 ABSTRACT THE NORMS FOR GRAS SUBSTANCE IN THE US FOOD LAW ABSTRACT In accordance with the Food Safety Law, China will solely establish national standards for the production of food additives, which probably results in the average use of the resource of administration supervision, the lack of the invest in the important fields of food safety, and even the barrier for rapid development of the food industry. Therefore, the filing of enterprise standards for food additives could be improved by reference to foreign experience. In the U.S., “generally recognized as safe” (GRAS) is a legal regime of food safety provided in 21 U.S.C. § 321(s), a legal standard and a kind of food. The GRAS concept comes from the exception from the food additive definition. If an enterprise shows a particular use of an adding food ingredient is generally recognized by qualified experts as safe, the ingredient constitutes the GRAS substance, which can be marketed without the “national standards” set by the government. General recognition of safety by experts may be based on scientific procedures or experience based on 1 common use in food. The notification procedure started in 1997 leads to the overexpansion of the GRAS substance and seriously reduces the implementation of the legal norms of food additive. The Coco Rico case complied in all-around manner with the norms of deciding GRAS in precedents, and interpreted by these norms the GRAS double-layer determination structure of 21 U.S.C. § 321(s). The Fmali case analyzed the legislative intents of 21 U.S.C. § 321(s) and pointed out that the core of the GRAS norms is general recognition of safety by experts. On this ground, the court reviewed the F

您可能关注的文档

文档评论(0)

jianzhongdahong + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档