梁启超与章太炎的民族史研究及其民族主义取向-中国近现代史专业论文.docxVIP

民族主义取向问题。在建立现代国家的目标上，他们是没有分歧 民族主义取向问题。在建立现代国家的目标上，他们是没有分歧 但是在要建立什么样的政体、什么样的民族共同体为依据建立现代国 家问题上，他们存在着一定的差异。这种认识上的分歧使得他们的民 族主义取向向着两个不同的方向发展，对近代中国的政治也产生了一 定的影响。 结论部分，主要探讨梁启超与章太炎的民族史研究的成就及其局 限的地方。 关键词梁启超，章太炎，民族史 Zhang Zhang Taiyan took history as a mirror and used it to save China．They actively advocated the history revolution．Under the background，¨new historydeveloped．The two historians turned to the ethnic history research during the time of ideological trend．This means the progress and development of modem Chinas ethnic history,the agreement of national and political community which came from their research had great influence on the construction of modem China． This paper uses the history research methods and methods relating to the national history to make a deep analysis on the viewpoints of Liang Qichao and Zhang Taiyan about ethnic history．Basing on this，the paper discusses the orientation and meaning of Liang Qichao and Zhang Taiyan’S nationalism．This paper includes five parts． The introduction part is mainly about the motivations of the research， the purpose and significance of Liang and Zhang’S viewpoints about ethnic history．This part also reviews the relating academic achievements． The first part mainly discusses the Liang Qichao and Zhang Taiyan’S directions of history research during the new history ideological trend． Firstly,the paper begins with the historical background of modem China’S society and combines with the modem western history theory and the of of Liang Qichao and Zhang Taiyan’S nationalism． The second part discusses the main contents of Liang Qichao and Zhang Taiyan’S ethnic history research，including their research on the origin of Chinese nationality and some other problems which they deeply The third part mainly analyzes the orientation of Liang Qichao and Zhang Taiyan’S viewpoints of nationalism reflected by their research on ethnic history．They had no disagreement on goals of establishing modem China．But they did not come to all agre