论反倾销救济制度-经济法专业论文.docxVIP

摘 摘 要 倾销与反倾销相伴而生，倾销是一种不公平贸易行为，而反倾销是行政机关旨在 抵制J臣倾销的具体行政行为，可能使利害关系人的合法权益受到损害，因此从1997年 11月lo日我国开始第一起反倾销案件调查起，反倾销的救济问题就被提上了议事日程 而现有的法律均不具备可操作性。我国已经加入世贸组织，为了保护利害关系人的合 法权益，为了维护和监督反倾销调查机关依法行使职权，必须对我国反倾销的救济制 度进行完善，以满足反倾销实践的需要。本文在对欧美反倾销法进行比较研究的基础 上，结合我国《行政复议法》和《行政诉讼法》的有关规定，对我国反倾销救济制度 的完善提出一些看法。在行政复议制度方面，应该允许对所有反倾销决定提起复议， 把抽象行政行为纳入行政复议范围，强化反倾销复议机构的独立性，取消反倾销案件 的行政最终裁决权，以行政复议作为提起反倾销行政诉讼的前置条件。在行政诉讼制 度方面，应当由被告所在地的中级人民法院作为第一审法院，对相对成熟的、对我国 产业保护有重要影响的反倾销决定进行司法审查，准确地确定诉讼当事人，审查内容 应坚持合法性审查原则，弱化事实审查，根据反倾销决定的不同情况，分别作出维持、 撤销、履行等判决。 AbstractDumping Abstract Dumping and antidumping are produced together．Dumping is a unfair trade Antidumping is a specific administrative behavior．Because it may harm the legal rights and interests of the interested party．Since November 10，1997 when china began the first antidumping investigation，the problem of antidumping remedy has been brought the agendas．But all existing laws can not operate．For the sake of protecting the lawful rights and interests of the involved and defending and supervising antidumping investigation mechanism’s performing its powers legally,we should perfect the remedy system of antidumping to meet the needs of practice after having entered WTO．With the base of comparative research on European and American antidumping laws and connection our {Administrative Review Law and(Administrative Procedure Law》，the thesis put forward some opinions ell how to perfect remedy system of antidumping．About admimstrative review system,the contents are to permit all antidumping decisions being reconsidered，to contain the abstract administrative behavior in the range of review,to strengthen the independence of the review mechanism，to cancel the administrative final rulling right relevant to antidumping and to apply for administrative review as a prerequisite of adrmistrative litigation．Concerning administrative litigation system,the middle court of defendant’s location should be regarded as the first trial court and give a judicial review to the re