- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
更昔洛韦联合泼尼松治疗带状疱疹的临床效果观察
王泽芳1周君武2唐艳2石宇2陈冷萍2
(四川省双流县第一人民医院610000)
【摘 要】目的观察更昔洛韦联合泼尼松治疗带状疱疹的临床效果。方法 将我院收治的78例带状疱疹患者随机分为观察组39例和对照组39例。观察组 患者在常规治疗的基础上行更昔洛韦联合泼尼松治疗,对照组患者在常规治疗的 基础上行单纯的更昔洛韦治疗。评价两组患者的临床治疗效果,统计患者临床症 状的改善时间;同时,检测患者治疗前后血清白细胞介素-16 (IL-6)和白细胞介 素JO (IL-10)的表达水平;并统计患者治疗后带状疱疹后遗神经痛(PHN)的发 牛率。结果观察组患者临床治疗的总有效率为92.31%,对照组为79.48%,两 组比较,差异具有统计学意义(P0.05);观察组患者治疗后平均止疱时间、结 痂时间、脱痂时间及疼痛缓解时间均短于对照组(P均0.05);治疗后,观察组 患者血清IL?6、IL?10的指标水平均低于对照组(P均V0.05)o同时,治疗后第 4周末、第8周末,观察组患者PHN的发生率均低于对照组(P均V0.05)。结论 更昔洛韦联合泼尼松治疗带状疱疹的临床效果显著,能有效降低患者PHN的发 牛率。
【关键词】带状疱疹;更昔洛韦;泼尼松;后遗神经痛
R752.1+2 B 1003-5028
(2015) 7-0117-02
Observe of the effect of ganciclovir combined with prednisone in the treatment of herpes zoster
[Abstract】objective: to observe of the effect of ganciclovir combined with prednisone in the treatment of herpes zoster. Methods: our hospitalrsquo;s 78 cases of patients with herpes zoster were divided into observation group (39 cases) and control group (39 cases). On the basis of routine therapy, the observation group patients were treated by ganciclovir combined prednisone, the control group patients were treated by Simple ganciclovir.2 groups of patients with the clinical treatment effect were evaluated, the improvement of the patients clinical symptoms time was counted; at the same time, before and after treatment, the patients serum interleukin -16 (IL - 6), interleukin 10 (IL -10) expression level was detected; And the patients post herpetic neuralgia (PHN) incidenee was counted. Results: observation group of patients with clinical treatment the total effective rate was 92.31%, control group was 79.48%, the comparison of two groups, statistically sign讦icant differenee (P lt; 0.05); Observation group of patients after treatment time, the average check of blister was scabby, scab off time and pain relief time was shorter than the control group (P lt; 0.05); After treatment, the observation group of patients with serum level of IL - 6, IL -10 indexes was lower than that of control group (P
文档评论(0)