论“受过行政处罚”与定罪的关系-法学专业论文.docxVIP

摘要 摘要 万方数据 万方数据 摘 要 在刑法立法与司法实践中，“受过行政处罚”的统一刑法立法模式一直是一 个围绕立法者与司法者的难题，几年来我国最高人民法院与最高人民检察院针 对经济犯罪和妨碍社会管理秩序犯罪出台的司法解释中越来越多地将“受过行 政处罚”作为定罪量刑的一种依据，更加引起法学界对这方面的广泛关注。我 国刑法和司法解释关于“受过行政处罚”在定罪中的地位的规定反映了此种人 比一次犯罪者具有更深的主观恶性与社会危害性，刑法作为保障法与最后手段 的特性，应当守住最后一道防线，给予受过行政处罚者又实施犯罪行为否定性 评价。但是，学术界对此方面研究几乎没有，因此从这一角度处罚，将目前“受 过行政处罚”相关刑法法律条文进行归类分析，得出不同模式，分析各模式的 优劣，寻找统一标准，实现行政处罚与刑罚处罚的完美衔接，构建法律体例一 体化。 关键词：行政处罚；定罪；关系 Abstract ABSTRACT In criminal legislation and judicial practice, any administrative punishment the unification of the criminal law legislation pattern has always been a around lawmakers and the judicial problem, over the past few years Chinas supreme peoples court and the supreme peoples procuratorate against economic crime and interfere with the judicial interpretation issued by the social management order crime increasingly will be any administrative punishment as a basis, the criterions for the conviction more caused extensive concern of legal science in this respect. China’s criminal law and judicial explanation about any administrative punishment in the role of regulation reflects the criterions for the conviction of the people more than an offender has subjective vicious and harmful to the society, the characteristics of the criminal law as a means of protection and the last, should hold the last line of defense, commits a crime to give administrative punisher trained or negative evaluation. Little, however, academic research, the author from the perspective of the penalty, will present any administrative punishment classifies the relevant legal provisions of criminal law analysis Key Words:Any administrative punishment;crime;relationship 目录 目录 目 录 第 1 章 引 言 ...................................................... 1 第 2 章 “受过行政处罚”与定罪实然模式之梳理 ........................ 3 2.1 次数模式 .................................................... 3 2.2“时间+次数”模式 ............................................ 4 2.2.1 一年+一次 ............................................. 4 2.2.2 一年+两次 ....