- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
報节腔内關捞3^1^节骨岐
节側的JSffl
2018-04-08 09:50:18中国现代医生2018年4期
季红辉蒋聿瑛补灿灿
[ ]戸的探讨系统性康复干预在关节腔内药物注射治疗膝关节骨性关节炎(OA)中的应用。 方法 选取2015年7月?2016年10月膝关节OA患者86例,将其分为康复组44例和对照组42 例。两组均予以膝关节腔内注射25 mg玻璃酸钠,1次/周,连用6周。对照组予以常规康复干预, 康复组加以系统性康复干预,两组均干预6周。观察两组干预治疗前后疼痛评分和膝关节功能变化, 并比较近期及远期临床效果。结果 干预6周后,两组VAS评分下降,HSS评分上升(PvO.05或 P0.01),且治疗后康复组VAS评分低于对照组,HSS评分高于对照组(P0.05 );同时康复组近 期临床总有效率优于对照组(x2=5.49, P0.05)。随访半年,康复组远期临床总有效率优于对照组 (X2=4.67, PvO.05)。结论系统性康复干预在关节腔内药物注射治疗膝关节OA中的应用效果较 肯定,能更有效缓解其临床症状,降低疼痛程度,提高膝关节功能,且远期效果亦较佳。
[关键词]骨性关节炎;膝关节;系统性康复干预;腔内药物注射
[中图分类号]R684.3 [文献标识码]B [文章编1673-9701 (2018) 04-0108-03
[Abstract] Objective To investigate the application of systemic rehabilitation intervention in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis (OA) by intra-articular injection of drugs? Methods Totally 86 patients with knee OA from July 2015 to October 2016 were divided into rehabilitation group
(n=44) and control group (n=42 )? Both groups were given intra-articular injection of 25 mg sodium hyalur on ate, 1 time/week, for 6 weeks. The control group was give n routi ne rehabilitation in tervention, and the rehabilitatio n group was treated with systemic rehabilitatio n interve ntion. Two groups were intervened for 6 weeks. The changes of pain scores and knee joint function before and after intervention were observed in both groups, and the clinical effects of short-term and long-term were compared. Results After 6 weeks of intervention, the VAS score in two groups decreased and the HSS score increased (P0.05 or P0.01) . After treatment, the VAS score of the rehabilitation group was lower than that of the control group and the HSS score of the rehabilitation group was higher than that of the control group (P0.05)? The short-term total clinical effective rate of the rehabilitation group was better than that of the control group(x2=5.49, P0.05). The patients were followed up for 6 months, and the Iong-term total clinical effective rate of the rehabilitation group was better than that of the control group (\2=4.67
原创力文档


文档评论(0)