血清多肿瘤标志物蛋白芯片检测结果在结直肠癌诊断中的价值.docVIP

血清多肿瘤标志物蛋白芯片检测结果在结直肠癌诊断中的价值.doc

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
PAGE PAGE 1 血清多肿瘤标志物蛋白芯片检测结果在结直肠癌诊断中的价值 龙 驰,胡义德,曹正怀 (400037 重庆,第三军医大学新桥医院全军肿瘤研究所) [摘要] 目的 探讨血清多肿瘤标志物蛋白芯片检测系统(C-12)检测结果对结直肠癌(CRC)的诊断价值。方法 采用C-12对130例住院CRC患者(CRC组)和108例门诊体检人员(对照组)血清进行检测,分析C-12在两组人群之间、CRC不同TNM分期之间、C-12包含的12种肿瘤标志物之间、不同肿瘤标志物联合检测之间的阳性率差异。结果 CRC组C-12阳性率显著高于对照组(P=0.001),随CRC分期升高而上升(P=0.001),其中CEA、CA242、CA19-9阳性率非常显著高于其余9项肿瘤标志物(P=0.000),CEA联合CA242、CA19-9检测能提高敏感度,但它们之间联合检测或12项肿瘤标志物联合检测与单项肿瘤标志物CEA相比无显著差异(P均>0.05)。结论 C-12有助于CRC诊断,临床分期越晚诊断价值越高,其中CEA、CA242、CA19-9的诊断价值优于其余9项肿瘤标志物,多肿瘤标志物联合检测能提高检测敏感度,但并不显著优于单项肿瘤标志物CEA。 [关键词] 蛋白芯片;肿瘤标志物;结直肠癌;癌胚抗原CEA;糖类抗原 CA242;糖类抗原CA19-9 [中图法分类号] R73-34;R446.11+2 [文献标志码] A Clinical value of the result of the protein chip system for multi-tumor markers in diagnosis of colorectal cancer Long Chi,Hu Yide,Cao Zhenghuai (Cancer Research Center,Xinqiao Hospital,Third Military Medical University,Chongqing,400037,China) [Abstract] Objective To explore the value of the result of the Protein Chip System for multi-tumor markers in diagnosis of colorectal cancer. Methods The serum concentrations of 12 tumor markers in 130 patients with colorectal cancer and 108 normal adults were detected by the C-12 multi-tumor markers protein chip diagnosis system and then the results were analyzed. Results The positive rate of C-12 was much higher in patients with colorectal cancer than that in normal adults(P=0.001) and increased along with the TNM clinical stage ((P=0.001)).The positive rates of CEA,CA242,CA19-9 were much higher than those of the other 9 tumor markers (P=0.000). Higher positive rate could be got when CEA combine with CA242 or CA19-9 in diagnosis of colorectal cancer. But against CEA, any form of combinations of the three most relevant tumor markers could not significantly improve the positive rate. There had no statistical significance between the positive rate of CEA and that of the C-12 too(P all>0.05). Conclusion The result of the Protein Chip System for multi-tumor markers was helpful in diagnosis of colorectal canc

您可能关注的文档

文档评论(0)

yanmei113 + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档