阿托伐他汀联合微创置管引流术与单行纯微创置管引流术治疗慢性硬.doc

阿托伐他汀联合微创置管引流术与单行纯微创置管引流术治疗慢性硬.doc

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
阿托伐他汀联合微创置管引流术与单纯行微创置管引流术治疗慢性硬膜下血肿患者的疗效差异 官春城 郭铭 梁晓华 冯金福 余英教 (广东省粤北人民医院神经外科 韶关512000) 摘要:目的:比较阿托伐他汀联合经锥颅微创置管引流术与单纯行经锥颅微创置管引流术治疗慢性硬膜下血肿患者的临床疗效差异。方法:选取2016年1月~2018年12月我院收治的62例慢性硬膜下血肿患者作为研究对象,随机分为对照组30例和观察组32例。对照组采用经锥颅微创置管引流术治疗;观察组采用微创置管引流术联合阿托伐他汀治疗。比较两组的临床疗效、神经功能缺损评分、日常生活活动能力量表评分、并发症发生情况和疾病复发情况。结果:治疗后,观察组临床疗效明显高于对照组,差异有统计学意义,P<0.05;观察组的神经功能缺损评分低于对照组,日常生活活动能力量表评分明显高于对照组,差异均有统计学意义,P<0.05;观察组总并发症发生率和复发率均明显低于对照组,差异均有统计学意义,P<0.05。结论:阿托伐他汀联合经锥颅微创置管引流术治疗慢性硬膜下血肿,可有效清除颅内血肿,改善患者神经功能,获得更好的临床疗效。 关键词:慢性硬膜下血肿;阿托伐他汀;经锥颅微创置管引流术 The Difference between Atorvastatin Combined with Minimally Invasive Catheter Drainage and Single Minimally Invasive Catheter Drainage in theTreatment of Patients with Chronic Subdural Hematoma GUAN Chun-cheng, GUO Ming, LIANG Xiao-hua, FENG Jin-fu, YU Ying-jiao (Neurosurgery Department of The Yue Bei People’s Hospital, Guangdong, Shaoguan512000) Abstract: Objective: To compare the difference between atorvastatin combined with minimally invasive catheter drainage and single minimally invasive catheter drainage in the treatment of chronic subdural hematoma patients. Methods: From January 2016 to December 2018, 62 patients with chronic subdural hematoma in our hospital were selected as research objects, and they were randomly divided into control group with 30 cases and observation group with 32 cases. The control group was treated with minimally invasive catheter drainage only, the observation group was treated with atorvastatin combined with minimally invasive catheter drainage. Compared the clinical efficacy, neurological deficit score, activity of daily living scale score, complications and disease recurrence between the two groups. Results: After the treatment, the clinical efficacy of the observation group was significantly higher than that of the control group, with statistical significance, P0.05; the neurological deficit score of the observation group was lower than that of the control group, and the activity of daily living scale score w

文档评论(0)

fengruiling + 关注
实名认证
内容提供者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档