- 1、本文档共10页,可阅读全部内容。
- 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
- 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
Two kinds of judgement
Digging
1 There are two different ways people judge you. Sometimes judging you correctly is the end goal. But there’s a second much more common type of judgment where it isn’t. We tend to regard all judgments of us as the first type. We’d probably be happier if we realized which are and which aren’t.
Digging
2 The first type of judgment, the type where judging you is the end goal, includes court cases, grades in classes, and most competitions. Such judgments can of course be mistaken, but because the goal is to judge you correctly, there’s usually some kind of appeals process. If you feel you’ve been misjudged, you can protest that you’ve been treated unfairly.
Digging
3 Nearly all the judgments made on children are of this type, so we get into the habit early in life of thinking that all judgments are.
Digging
4 But in fact there is a second much larger class of judgments where judging you is only a means to something else. These include college admissions, hiring and investment decisions, and of course the judgments made in dating. This kind of judgment is not really about you.
Digging
5 Put yourself in the position of someone selecting players for a national team. Suppose for the sake of simplicity that this is a game with no positions, and that you have to select 20 players. There will be a few stars who clearly should make the team, and many players who clearly shouldn’t. The only place your judgment makes a difference is in the borderline cases. Suppose you screw up and underestimate the 20th best player, causing him not to make the team, and his place to be taken by the 21st best. You’ve still picked a good team.
Digging
If the players have the usual distribution of ability, the 21st best player will be only slightly worse than the 20th best. Probably the difference between them will be less than the measurement error.
Digging
6 The 20th best player may feel he has been misjudged. But your goal here wasn’t to provide a servic
您可能关注的文档
最近下载
- 违章驾驶员交通安全培训精品课件.pptx
- Panasonic松下电器卫浴产品 电子坐便器CH2N615WSC_2N625GYC用户手册.pdf
- 人教部编版四年级下册语文第五单元教案设计(含交流平台习作例文和习作教案).doc
- 小学数学_青岛版六年级下册数学智慧广场“鸡兔同笼”问题教学设计学情分析教材分析课后反思.doc
- 2023年南京特殊教育师范学院特殊教育专业《普通心理学》期末试卷A(有答案).docx VIP
- 猪的信号(育肥猪).doc
- 机械设计基础(第六版)杨可桢课后习题答案.pdf
- 紧密型县域医疗卫生共同体消毒供应中心运营指南(2020年版 医联体建设).docx
- 《潍坊港总体规划》报告.doc
- 巧用仪式感提升高中阶段班级管理.docx VIP
文档评论(0)