从于欢案谈被害人过错影响刑事责任的理论困境.docVIP

从于欢案谈被害人过错影响刑事责任的理论困境 The Theoretical Predicament of the Effect of the Victims FaultTheory on the Criminal Responsibility from Yu Huans Case 作者： 袁继红 作者简介： 袁继红，四川大学法学院博士研究生，浙江大学城市学院 教授。 原文出处： 《苏州大学学报：法学版》2018年第20181期 第82-89页 内容提要： 于欢一案判决引发争论，实乃我国被害人过错理论困境所 致。当被害人过错成为刑事司法中常见问题时，被害人过 错对刑事责任的影响也必然成为了一个不能回避的理论与 实务问题。然而目前具有阻却违法实质意义的被害人过错 却被限定为酌定情节，且在量刑中显得可有可无。内涵模 糊的不法侵害亦与被害人过错相疏离，“入罪型”犯罪构 成模式缺少违法性阻却判断，因而造成被害人过错无法发 挥违法性阻却功能。在既有犯罪构成框架下，应当赋予犯 罪客体对违法性判断的功能，进一步厘定不法侵害的内涵 与外延，改变被害人过错理论在刑法体系中的定位，让被 害人过错真正具备阻却违法性的实质价值，从而突破被害 人过错仅仅作为酌定情节的现实困境。 The controvcrsy aroused by the judgment of Yu Huan5 s Case was caused by the victims fauIt theory in our country. Once the victims fauIt has become a common problem in criminal justice, its effeet on criminal responsibility will inevitably become an unavoidable theoretical and practical issue.Although the victims fault theory has thepractical function of deterring the illegality, its application is only limited to discretionary^ circumstances and dispensable in the sentence.The illegal infringement due to its uncertain meaning is also alienated from the victims fault. The mode of the constitution called guilty type lacks the judgment of illegality, which leads to the victims fauIt theory being unable to exert illegality.Given the framework of existing crime, the criminal object should be attached with the function of judging the illegality, the connotation and denotation of the illegal infringement should be further clarified, the position of the victim，s fault theory should be changed in the criminal law system, in order to make the victims fault theory truly have the substantive value of deterring illegality, and resolve the practical dilemma of the victims fault only being a discretionary factor. 期刊名称：《刑事法学》复印期号：2018年07期 词: 词: 正当防卫/被害人过错/不法侵害/违法阻却 Justifiable Defense/the Victims Fault/Illegal Infringement/Illegality Deterrence 中图分类号：D924文献标识码：A文章编号：2095-7076(2018)01-0082-08 一、问题的提岀 〃于欢案引发了前所未有的全民大讨论,被害人过错是否影响刑事责任成为 本案的焦点。显然，本案中被害人过错在一审中