论我国行政诉讼中举证责任.docVIP

PAGE PAGE 10 PAGE 论我国行政诉讼中举证责任及举证责任分配 摘 要 行政诉讼是公民、法人或者其他组织认为行政机关和行政机关工作人员的具体行政行为侵犯其合法权益而向法院提起的诉讼。而行政诉讼中举证责任是诉讼当事人为了使本身的诉讼主张得到法院裁判的确认，所承担的提供和运用证据支持自己的主张以避免对于己方不利的诉讼后果。在行政诉讼中，合理分配举证责任,不仅关系到法律的实体公正，更关系到能否构建一个有效率的诉讼程序。因此，完善我国的行政诉讼举证责任制度,对于促进我国行政诉讼证据制度发展完善,从而保障行政诉讼公平、公正和高效,具有积极意义。 2014年底，我国对《中华人民共和国行政诉讼法》作出了第一次修订，修改后的行诉法在证据制度上有所完善。本文从行政诉讼举证责任及举证责任分配的概念、性质等几方面综合分析；并对行诉法进行修订前后对照,通过和国外举证责任分配的模式进行比较印证，指出当前我国行诉法在举证责任制度方面的一些欠缺，并提出几点完善建议。 关键字：行政诉讼、证据、举证责任 The burden of administrative proceedings and allocate the burden of proof Major：law Discipline Student： Supervisor： Abstracts Administrative Procedure Law is enacted in accordance with the provisions of the constitution of a procedural law, which provides that the courts of legal norms and administrative litigation cases participants administrative procedures to exercise their rights, obligations of various laws and regulations, Chinas socialist legal system an important basic laws. Reasonable allocation of the burden of proof in administrative proceedings, not only to the substantive justice of the law, more related to the ability to build an efficient proceedings. Therefore, to improve our system of administrative proceedings the burden of proof, the evidence for the promotion of the development of theoretical study of administrative litigation system in China, in order to protect the administrative litigation fairness, justice, has very important significance. This article from the concept of burden of proof in administrative proceedings, the nature of the burden of proof in administrative proceedings and other aspects of the distribution, a comprehensive analysis of the burden of proof and the Administrative Procedure Law, the substance of the allocation of responsibilities, and through the allocation of the burden of proof and foreign models compare the pros and cons, make perfect opi