论文_浅议悬赏广告的法律性质.pdf

分院名称： 学生学号： 长春师范学院 本科毕业论文（设计） （社科类） 题 目： 浅议悬赏广告的法律性质 专 业： 作 者 姓 名： 指导教师姓名： 指导教师职称： 2013 年 3 月 摘要 关于悬赏广告的法律性质法学界对此观点不一，而且司法实践的判决也大相 径庭。在我国目前还没有对悬赏广告做出具体规定的情况下，对悬赏广告的相关 问题进行研究是非常有意义的。悬赏广告之法律性质目前学界主要有这两种观点， 即 “契约行为说”与 “单方行为说”。文章结合对单独行为说和契约行为说的具 体分析从而对悬赏广告法律性质进行研究，运用相关法律知识及其基本原理，综 合分析比较两种学说，并对两种学说进行分析和评述，尽管二者都各有优缺点， 但我还是比较支持把悬赏广告行为理解成为单方法律行为。这不仅符合法理还有 利于司法实践，同时还有利于促成交易并保障其安全，实现当事人利益。 关键词：悬赏广告 法律性质 单方行为说 立法建议 长春师范学院（毕业论文） Abstract About the legal nature of reward advertisement whether this view is differ, and the decisions of the judicial practice is also different. To reward advertisement in our country has not made specific provision, study of reward advertisement related question makes sense. Advertising the legal nature of reward for the educational world mainly have the two views, namely "contract behavior" and "unilateral action". Based on individual behavior and contractual behavior of the concrete analysis and study of reward advertisement legal nature, the related legal knowledge and the basic principle, the comprehensive analysis and comparison of two theories, and the two theories are summarized and analyzed. Based on the analysis and evaluation of the two views, though both have its advantages and disadvantages, but I support the reward advertisement understanding be unilateral legal act. This not only conforms to the legal theory and judicial practice, but also conducive to facilitate trades and guarantee its security, realize the part