债权侵权制度法律问题研究.pdfVIP

债权侵权制度法律问题研究 中文摘要 债权侵权理论研究已久，我国学界对债权侵权责任的认定问题仍有较大争 议，而 （2017）最高法民终181号民事判决书对我国债权侵权制度的发展具有重 要意义。此案反映出我国债权侵权制度中存在的问题：适用具体法律规范认定债 权侵权责任时存在请求权基础薄弱且法理支撑不足的问题；债权侵权责任与其他 救济途径之间界限的不明确导致适用侵权责任法保护债权时存在一定障碍；认定 债权侵权责任的法律适用规则不统一。 本文除绪论外主要分为四个部分：一是债权侵权制度概述，明确阐述了债权 侵权制度的内涵并分析了我国债权侵权制度的构建现状。二是分析完善我国债权 侵权制度的必要性，从确定明确的请求权基础的需求和法学理论层面的需求两个 方面出发；分析完善我国债权侵权制度的可行性，主要从具有深厚的理论配置基 础和制度完善空间两方面展开论述。三是阐述适用侵权责任法保护债权的理由， 厘清了债权侵权责任与违约责任、债的保全、破产撤销权等之间的界限，明确了 可以认定债权侵权责任的具体情形。四是探索完善我国债权侵权制度法律适用规 则的路径，明确了债权侵权责任主体一般为第三人，债务人与第三人恶意通谋可 构成共同侵权；债权侵权责任归责原则应确定为一般的过错责任原则；明确了债 权侵权责任的具体构成要件为：侵害债权的行为必须具备不法性特征、侵权行为 须直接或间接导致债权灭失或影响债权实现的结果、行为与结果之间须具有相当 因果关系、故意和过失均可作为过错要件。 关键词：债权侵权，归责原则，构成要件，责任认定 I RESEARCH ON LEGALISSUESOF CREDITORSRIGHTS INFRINGEMENTSYSTEM Abstract There hasbeen deep research of creditors rights infringement,there is still much controversy in Chinas academic community regarding the identification of liability for creditors rights infringement.And the civil judgement No.181 of the Supreme People’s Court in 2017 has great value to the development of Chinas creditors rights infringement system.However,this case also reflects the problems existing in Chinas creditors infringement system:when applying specific laws andregulationsto identify liability for creditors rights infringement, there is a problem that thebasis of claim is frail and the legal support is insufficient;the unclear boundary between the tort liability for creditorsrights infringement and other remedies causing certain obstacles to the application of the tort liability law;the rules applicable to identify the tort liability for creditorsrightsinfringement arenotuniform. Apart from the introduction, the thesis is divided into four parts:the first part is an overview of the c