刑事速裁程序的发展.docxVIP

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
西南石油大学本科毕业论文 PAGE 13 摘 要 刑事速裁程序是近年来我国司法体制改革的重要内容,2018年修改后的《刑事诉讼法》以统一立法的形式将其规定为刑事速裁程序,以便与普通诉讼程序、简易 程序的刑事诉讼程序相区别。关于刑事速裁程序的明确,极大程度上优化了司法资源配置,推动了案件繁简分流,从而提高办案效率和质量,促进社会稳定和谐。目前,刑事速裁程序从最初试点的开展到正式写入我国刑事诉讼法已经持续推进了几年的时间。总体来看,刑事速裁程序的完善和建立有效缓解了当前我国总体的司法审判储备存在欠缺,而现实中各类刑事案件数量却与日俱增的局面。多地基层法院都积极适用并且取得了不错的工作成效。但与此同时,现实的工作运用中也发现了关于刑事速裁程序的的诸多弊端。比如就目前而言,其适用的范围比较窄、值班律师参与不足、当事人权益得不到保障等等。在此背景下,本文对刑事速裁程序从立法环节到现实运用中存在的诸多问题提供相对应的建议,希望对于我国的刑事速裁程序存在不足之处处予以完善。 关键词:刑事速裁程序;诉讼效率;权利保障 Abstract The fast-track criminal procedure is an important part of Chinas judicial system reform in recent years. The revised Criminal Procedure Law in 2018 stipulates it as a criminal procedure independent of ordinary procedure and summary procedure in the form of unified legislation. The application of the fast-track criminal procedure greatly optimizes the allocation of judicial resources and promotes the streamlining of cases, thus improving the efficiency and quality of handling cases and promoting social stability and harmony. At present, the criminal expedited procedure has continued for several years from the beginning of the initial pilot to the official writing of Chinas criminal procedure law. On the whole, the perfection and establishment of the criminal expedited procedure effectively alleviated the contradiction of insufficient judicial trial resources in our country and the continuous increase in the prosecution of various criminal cases. Many grassroots courts have actively applied and achieved good results. But at the same time, there are still some outstanding problems in the specific practice process, which are worthy of our serious consideration. For example, the scope of application of the law is too narrow, the participation of duty lawyers is insufficient, and the rights and interests of the parties are not guaranteed. Under this background, this article puts forward some opinions and suggestions on the legislative deficiencies and the problems in practice in order to provide some reference f

文档评论(0)

文章交流借鉴 + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

妙笔如花

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档