- 1、本文档共10页,可阅读全部内容。
- 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
- 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
A Comparative Study of Input Hypothesis and Output Hypothesis
Abstract: The essay compares the differences between input hypothesis and output hypothesis as well as their similarities based on literature and empirical studies. As for the differences, theoretical rests and attitudes towards output are taken into consideration. In terms of the similarities, both input hypothesis and output hypothesis are comprehensible and modified, have something to do with “i+1” and share the same attitude towards pushed output.
Key words: input hypothesis; output hypothesis; comprehensible; modified
中图分类号: H319文献标识码: A文章编号:1672-1578(2010)07-0020-02
1 Input hypothesis
Krashen (1982) provides five hypotheses, in which he believes that the input hypothesis is the most important one as it touches upon directly the most fundamental question of second language acquisition (SLA). Based on the hypothesis, he introduces the concept of comprehensible input, namely, language acquisition conforms to the pattern of “ i+1 ”, that is, language acquisition shall take place if and only if the comprehensible input is just slightly higher than the learner’s current language ability.
2 Output hypothesis
Swain (2005, p471) argued that output, by its nature, is not the end of production, but rather a process of the language learning. Therefore, output, if carefully taken care of, can also contribute to the language learning. In order to prove this, she has outlined three functions conducive to second language learning: a) the noticing and triggering function, b) the hypothesis-testing function and c) the metalinguistic function.
3 Differences
3.1 Theoretical rests
Krashen’s input hypothesis is fundamentally based on the Nativist Theories, which maintains that the innate biological endowment is the precondition for learners to acquire another language (Diane Larsen-freeman and Michael H. Long, 2000). In this sense, what the second language learner has to do is to take
文档评论(0)