功能学派翻译理论(1)...pptVIP

The Fidelity Rule There must be coherence between the translatum and the ST ＊the ST information ＊the interpretation ＊the information that is encoded back 第二十九页，共53页。 Jeremy Munday’s Comments on the Skopos Theory The hierarchical order of the rules Intertextual coherence (rule5) less important Intratextual coherence (rule 4) subordinate the skopos (rule 1) 第三十页，共53页。 Skopos Theory Advantage: different purposes of the same ST different TTs Illustration in page80 第三十一页，共53页。 the commission a goal the conditions under which that goal should be achieved (including deadline and fee) 第三十二页，共53页。 Skopos Theory The nature of the TT ＊“is primarily determined by its skopos or commission”, ＊Adequacy comes to override equivalence as the measure of the translational action.(in page 80) Functional adequacy deescribes the relations between the ST and the TT as a consequence of observing a skopos during the translation process. It is functionally and communicatively adequate. A question and a research point for us： DISCUSSION in page 88: How is ‘adequacy’ is judged, and by whom? 第三十三页，共53页。 Discussion of Skopos Theory Nord and Schaffner Holz-Manttari Page 80 –81 Vermeer的目的论是在现代语言学（实用语言学、语言行为论和话语语言学）以及接受美学的启发和影响下逐步发展起来的。他突破了Reiss功能对等研究的束缚，借鉴并完善了Holt-manttari的翻译行为论，积极回应(huí yīnɡ)各方对目的论的质疑，使该理论逐步深入、成熟。—谢天振《当代国外翻译理论导读》Page157 第三十四页，共53页。 It is a ‘general’ theory is in fact only valid for non-literary texts. So what about literary ones? Reiss’s text type approach and Vermeer’s skopos theory are in fact considering different functional phenomena and cannot be lumped together. Skopos theory does not pay sufficient attention to the linguistic nature of the ST nor to the reproduction of microlevel features in the TT. 第三十五页，共53页。 Jargon such as translatum does little to further translation theory, where workable terms already exist, and that consideration of