- 1、本文档共125页,可阅读全部内容。
- 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
- 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
Table of Contents目录;What do we intend to achieve in the course?本次课程我们要到达的目的?〔1〕;Is our organization ready to utilize the Baldrige Award?
我们的组织是否具备使用波多里奇奖的环境?
How to implement the Baldrige Award criteria?
怎样实施波多里奇奖标准?
How to carry out self-assessment based on Baldrige Award Criteria?
怎样基于波多里奇奖标准进行自评?
如何编写自评报告?
;Subject 1 主题1
Background of Performance
Excellence and Baldrige Award
Overview
业绩卓越奖的背景以及波多里奇
奖的概况;The First Quality Award最早的质量奖〔1〕;Deming showed great sympathy for the predicament of his hosts, for example by donating the income from his lectures to the Union of Japanese Engineers and Scientists (JUSE). So when JUSE decided in 1951 to establish a national award to promote quality management, it was natural that they should name it for Dr. Deming. It became the standard by which business excellence was judged in Japan for more than 40 years.
戴明对日本的困境显示了很大的同情心,例如他将讲课的收入捐赠给日本科学家与工程师联合会〔JUSE〕。所以当1951年JUSE决定建立提高质量管理的国家质量奖时,便以戴明博士的名字命名。此奖项现在被认为是日本40多年来商业卓越方面的最高奖项。;The Emerging of Baldrige Award (1)波多里奇奖的出现〔1〕;
在相同的时期内,质量管理技术已经成为日本的经济奇迹以及日本向全球市场渗透的基石。当美国抛弃质量管理并将其作为一份无心 的礼物赠送给日本,是日本又在后来将其回赠给美国。1980年美国重新对质量感兴趣主要是由于外国竞争的巨大影响。;By the mid 1980s there was panic in many quarters in the USA. Foreign competition seemed to be having its way and no one could figure out why, or how to stop the rot. All kinds of madcap theories and solutions were being discussed, in industry, in the media and among politicians. At this time only a relatively few U.S. companies such as Xerox and Ford had figured out what the real problem was—primarily poor management practices—and were learning how to clean up their act and fight back.
80年代中期,美国的许多地方出现了经济恐慌。外国竞争似乎为所欲为并且没有人知道怎样应对。所有荒唐的理论和“解决方案〞都在被行业、媒体乃至政治家之间讨论。此时,美国只有少数公司,例如施乐和福特领悟到真正的问题是——从根本上缺乏管理标准——并学习如何整顿自己的行为以及回击。;Others, such as General Motors didnt understand this at all. GMs response was to bet the farm on a strategy of using technology to replace people, which proved to be a disastrous. Other companies became convinced t
文档评论(0)