人性化护理干预对慢性心力衰竭患者负性心理及心功能的影响（基础医学范文）.docVIP

人性化护理干预对慢性心力衰竭患者负性心理及心功能的影响（基础医学范文） 文档信息 ： 文档作为关于“医学心理学”中“护理学”的参考范文，为解决如何写好实用应用文、正确编写文案格式、内容素材摘取等相关工作提供支持。正文10038字，doc格式，可编辑。质优实惠，欢迎下载！ 目录 TOC \o 1-9 \h \z \u 目录 1 正文 2 文1：人性化护理干预对慢性心力衰竭患者负性心理及心功能的影响 2 1 对象与方法 3 1.1 研究对象 3 1.2 入组标准及排除标准 4 1.3 方法 4 1.4 评价指标 5 1.5 统计学方法 5 2 结果 6 2.1 两组干预前后的SAS、SDS评分比较 6 2.2 两组患者干预前后LVEF比较 6 3 讨论 6 文2：参附注射液对慢性心力衰竭患者心功能的影响探 9 1 资料与方法 11 2 结 果 12 2.1 两组临床疗效比较（见表1） 12 3 讨 论 12 [1][2]下一页 13 参考文摘引言： 14 原创性声明（模板） 15 文章致谢（模板） 15 正文 人性化护理干预对慢性心力衰竭患者负性心理及心功能的影响（基础医学范文） 文1：人性化护理干预对慢性心力衰竭患者负性心理及心功能的影响 [Abstract] Objective To investigate the effect of humanistic nuing intervention on the negative psychology and cardiac function of patients with chronic heart failure. Methods 60 cases of chronic heart failure in our hospital from June 2015 to June 2016 were randomly divided into intervention group and control group， each group of 30 cases. The control group was given routine nuing， the intervention group was given the humanized nuing intervention on the basis of the control group， the negative psychology of the two groups of patients with anxiety and depression were evaluated and compared before and after the intervention， the LVEF levels of cardiac function in patients chronic heart failure were evaluated. Results There were no significant differences in SAS and SDS scores between the two groups before intervention（P0.05）； After intervention， the SAS and SDS scores in two groups of patients were significantly lower than those before intervention， with statistically significant difference（P0.05）； after intervention， the LVEF levels of two groups increased significantly than before intervention， with statistically significant difference（P0.05）； the level of LVEF in the intervention group was significantly higher than the control group， there were significant differences（P0.05）. Conclusion In active treatment at the same time，patients with chronic heart failure in implementing the human