中外产品责任法比较和我国的对策研究.pdf

中外产品责任法比较和我国的对策研究 摘 要 随着全球经济一体化进程的迅猛发展，国际贸易活动日益频繁，而在此过程中 国际间产品责任的争端也常有发生。为了保护消费者的合法权益，促进经济的健康 发展，各国纷纷通过产品责任立法来解决产品责任问题。由于各国所属法律体系不 同，立法的出发点不同，社会政治、经济背景不同，从而导致产品责任立法的规定 也不尽相同。我国产品责任立法起步较晚，而且尚不成熟，因而尚有待完善之处。 同时国内的企业也应该熟知欧美各国相关法律规定,正确评估出口产品的责任风险, 制定相关的对策,以期在国际竞争中处于有利地位。 本文通过对中外产品责任立法中有关产品概念、产品责任归责原则、产品责任 损害赔偿等问题进行比较研究，阐述了欧美产品责任法的特点，及我国产品责任立 法的不足之处，进而提出了个人对完善我国产品责任立法的几点建议和我国企业应 采取的对策，在理论上和现实工作中都有重要意义。 关键词：产品责任法，产品，产品责任 I 中外产品责任法比较和我国的对策研究 Abstract With the rapid development of the economic globalization, the frequency of the international trade increases very fast. Accordingly, the issues on product obligations among nations become more frequently as well. In order to protect the legal rights of consumers and make the economy grow up in a health direction. Counties begin to seek the methods to solve the product-obligation problems through the legislation for the product obligations. However, the difference obviously appears in the regulations of product obligations among the countries, which is lead by the different law systems, the various reasons for the legislation and the diversified background of the social politics and economy. China started to legislate in product obligation relatively late and it has not become mature until now, hence there are many aspects which need to be improved in the future. And at the same time, in order to in upper hand, our corporation should know other countries law, evaluate the risk of export exactitude, and make some countermeasure. In this thesis, the author did some research and analyzed several disadvantages of the product-obligation legislation in china by comparing some situations of