监督管理模式和领先的领导风格非常适合工作满意度的提高外文翻译.docVIP

外文翻译 原文 Regulatory Mode and Preferred Leadership Styles: How Fit Increases Job Satisfaction Material Source: BASIC AND APPLIED SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 29(2),137-149 Author: Arie W. Kruglanski，Antonio Pierro, E. Tory Higgins. Four studies conducted in diverse organizational contexts examined preferences and fit between two regulatory modes, referred to as ‘‘locomotion’’ and ‘‘assessment’’ (Higgins,Kruglanski, Pierro, 2003; Kruglanski, et al., 2000), and leadership styles practiced by supervisors over their subordinates. The locomotion mode constitutes the aspect of self-regulation that is concerned with movement from state to state, and the assessment mode constitutes the aspect of self-regulation that is concerned with making comparisons.The present studies consistently show that individuals high in locomotion prefer a ‘‘forceful’’ leadership style, represented by ‘‘coercive’’, ‘‘legitimate’’, and ‘‘directive’’ kinds of strategic influence, whereas individuals high in assessment prefer an ‘‘advisory’’ leader-ship style, represented by ‘‘expert’’, ‘‘referent’’, and ‘‘participative’’ kinds of strategic influence. Consistent with regulatory fit theory (Higgins, 2000), the job satisfaction of subordinates was found to be higher when the style of strategic influence practiced by their supervisor fit their regulatory mode orientation (high locomotion/‘‘forceful’’ style;high assessment/‘‘advisory’’ style). Social influence, conceived of in terms of the ways whereby people deliberately affect each other’s actions,cognitions and feelings, counts among social psychology’s most fundamental topics of study. Whether one deals with conformity, persuasion, leadership or social change, the underlying concern is with social influence in one of its forms. From both theoretical and pragmatic perspectives, a particularly interesting question concerns the strategies of social influence. Over the centuries, writers like Machiavelli, Hobbes, Dale Carnegie and many others had numerous ins