基于社会网络分析中外图书馆学合作模式比较的研究.docVIP

基于社会网络分析的中外图书馆学合作模式比较研究* 温芳芳*　　　　　　　　　　杨思洛 河南科技大学管理学院 洛阳 471023　　湘潭大学公共管理学院　湘潭　41105 [摘 要] 本文以SSCI和CSSCI数据库中收录的图书馆学期刊论文作为样本数据，采用文献计量、社会网络分析及可视化方法，分别从合作程度历时变化情况、作者合作网络、机构合作网络等几个方面，对中外图书馆学的合作研究模式进行比较分析。结果表明：首先，国内图书馆学的合作程度逐年提升，并且已经赶超国外；其次，国内的合作关系呈现出较为极端的分布状况，网络结构表现出显著的星型特征；最后，国内合作网络中师生合作关系所占比重过大，强弱联合的特征更为明显，国外的合作关系则以业缘为主，强强联合的现象更为普遍。总体而言，国内图书馆学在合作研究方面呈现出良好的发展势头，但距离国际水平尚有一定差距，合作模式有待优化。 [关键词] 合作模式；合著；图书馆学；中外比较；社会网络分析 [分类号] G250 Comparative Study on Domestic and International Co-author Patterns of Library Science Based on Social Network Analysis Wen Fangfang (College of Management, Henan University of Science and Technology, Luoyang 471023) [Abstract] This paper chooses the papers indexed in CSSCI and SSCI as sample and takes comparative study on co-author patterns in the field of Library Science by means of Social Network Analysis. It has found that there are similarities and differences between domestic and international co-author patterns. Firstly, collaborative tendency in China has enhanced greatly during recent years in the field of Library Science and has catch up with international degree. Secondly, domestic co-authorship presents extreme distribution and star-shaped structure. Thirdly, the domestic co-authorship always appears between graduates and supervisors. On the contrary, the co-authorship abroad is mainly based on kinship while powerful alliances are much more popular. Above all, for the collaborative research in the field of Library Science, although domestic development has demonstrated positive trend, there exists obvious gap comparing with the international level, as well as the collaborative patterns need further optimization. [Keywords] Collaboration Patterns; Co-authorship; Library Science; Comparative Analysis; Social Network Analysis 在大科学时代背景之下，的合作化和集体化趋势不断增强 [1]。因此，合著论文的计量分析成为合作模式研究的常用手段，尤其是社会网络分析方法及可视化工具的出现，为其提供了新的研究视角和更为有效的研究手段。 本文以CSSCI和SSCI数据库中收录的图书馆学期刊论文作为样本数据，采用社会网络分析方法，对中外图书馆学领域作者和机构的合作关系及网络进行比较分析，以定量化和可视化的手段，发掘图书馆学合作模式所呈现出的规律与特征，寻找中外图书