ww关于对湖北大学甘永超先生论文的反驳.pdfVIP

关于对湖北大学甘永超先生论文的反驳 §† § § 苏湛 ，曹鹏 ，汪淏田 §中国科学技术大学 合肥 230026 † 通讯联系人. Email: suzhan@mail.ustc.edu.cn 摘 要： 本文从四个方面来对甘先生的论文进行评价： 1 对于经典电磁场的分解方面，他在没有理解前 人做法的基础上，主观臆断了一些推导的过程。 2 他的波粒二象性分类存在交叠问题，反映了他的分类的 错误。 3 经典的电磁理论在处理电子对电磁波的散射过程中使用了一些近似的过程才得出了电子散射出的 电磁波在电子受迫振动中心静止的坐标系中波长不变的结论，由于有近似的存在，处理的得到的结果本身 就是在忽略了小量 （ ）的情况下得出的，因而并不是一个精确的结果，而甘先生却错误地将其当作一 个由经典电磁场理论得出的精确结果，这是错误的。4 在数学问题上，甘先生并没有真正理解极限的定义， 在阐明极限的定义后，甘先生的Lorentz-Compton 佯谬自然就会得到解决。这也就说明了甘先生无法获得 诺贝尔奖。 关键词： 电磁场的分解，Lorentz-Compton 佯谬，波粒二象性，电磁波散射 Disproof to the paper of Mr. Gan from Hubei University §† § § Zhan Su ，Peng Cao ，Haotian Wang §University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026, People’s Republic of China Abstract In this paper, we analyze the paper of Mr. Gan in four aspects. 1 In terms of the expansion of the classical electromagnetic field, he subjectively assumes some deduction without understand the methods used by predecessors. 2 There is a overlap in his classification of the wave-particle duality which render his classification invalid. 3 To deal with the scattering process of electron to the electromagnetic wave, we need to use some approximation to get the conclusion that the frequency of the electromagnetic wave does not change in the coordinate where electron stay unmoved. Thus it is not an accurate result. But Mr. Gan mistake that for an accurate result which further disproves his result. 4 In the aspect of Mathematics, Mr. Gan has not understood the definition of limit. To make the definition clear, the so-called Lorentz-Compton paradox can be solved naturally which means Mr. Gan could not get the Nobel Prize