- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
Al-Kidd v. Ashcroft, 580 F.3d 949 (CIR9 2009).ppt
Al-Kidd v. Ashcroft, 580 F.3d 949 (CIR9 2009) The Charges What law was Al-Kidd held on? Was he personally charged or accused of terrorism? How was he treated? How long did this go on? What about after he was released from prison? Getting Past Iqbal Why did the United States Supreme Court find that Iqbal could not use Ashcroft and other high officials for this mistreatment? Why did this pose the real possibility that even if he were to sue lower level officials that they would be qualified immunity? What would be necessary to get to Ashcroft or others in DOJ? How is this like Rodney King? What was the Plan? What did Al-Kidd allege that got to Ashcroft without depending on vicarious liability? What is the key to cell for material witnesses? How do these Facts Support Al-Kidds Case that His Confinement was Pretextual? Al-Kidd’s arrest was sought a month after Al-Hussayen was indicted, and more than a year before trial began, temporally distant from the time any testimony would have been needed. The FBI had previously investigated and interviewed al-Kidd, but had never suggested, let alone demanded, that he appear as a witness. The FBI conducted lengthy interrogations with al-Kidd while in custody, including about matters apparently unrelated to Al-Hussayen’s alleged visa violations. Al-Kidd never actually testified for the prosecution in Al-Hussayen’s or any other case, despite his assurances that he would be willing to do so. Ashcroft’s immediate subordinate, FBI Director Mueller, testified before Congress that al-Kidd’s arrest (rather than, say, the obtaining of the evidence he was supposedly going to provide against Al-Hussayen) constituted a “major success[ ]” in “identifying and dismantling terrorist networks.” Should there be Immunity? Why no absolute (prosecutorial) immunity? What about qualified immunity? Ashcroft alternatively contends that if we conclude that the use of material witness orders for investigatory purposes violates the Constitution, we should st
您可能关注的文档
- 21世纪什么最重要? .ppt
- 4 bit Versatile CMOS Rate Multiplier.ppt
- 4.4 Modeling and Optimization.ppt
- 40 and 100 GbE –Network Interfaces of the Future.ppt
- 40 Gbs and 100 GbsTechnologies forResearch & Education.ppt
- 4MB Clinical Problem-Solving.ppt
- 7.5 线索二叉树.ppt
- 8.1. Non-contrast CT Brain.ppt
- 9 Intangibles.ppt
- 9. AJAX & RIA.ppt
- Alcohol Dehydrogenase.ppt
- Altered Cellular and Tissue Biology.ppt
- ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE.ppt
- American Attitudes Towards Death and Dying.ppt
- Amtrak Emissions Reduction Initiatives.ppt
- An Introduction to Boosting.ppt
- Analogue to Digital Conversion.ppt
- APNIC Open Policy Meeting 19-21 August 2001.ppt
- Archiving UpdateJune 9, 2003.ppt
- Assessing and Teaching Language.ppt
最近下载
- 2025年中国气泡水行业深度调研与行业竞争对手分析报告.docx
- 高等教育学教学课件电子教案全套课件.pptx VIP
- 46桂阳县方元镇秀里村和荷叶镇山田村历史遗留砷渣污染场地风险管控项目附件文本.docx VIP
- 2024人教版PEP英语三年级上册全册教学设计教案含反思.pdf
- 课题材料目录.pdf
- 美好生活劳动创造-中职生劳动教育教程PPT完整全套教学课件.pptx VIP
- 第十四届全多媒体课件大赛获奖作品名单-初中组.doc VIP
- 湖北省武汉市2020年中考英语真题(含答案).docx VIP
- 2026届高考写作指导:先行者与后来者作文主体段讲解.pptx VIP
- 《GBT_20801.1-2020_压力管道规范_工业管道_第1部分_总则》.pdf VIP
文档评论(0)