Al-Kidd v. Ashcroft, 580 F.3d 949 (CIR9 2009).ppt

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
Al-Kidd v. Ashcroft, 580 F.3d 949 (CIR9 2009).ppt

Al-Kidd v. Ashcroft, 580 F.3d 949 (CIR9 2009) The Charges What law was Al-Kidd held on? Was he personally charged or accused of terrorism? How was he treated? How long did this go on? What about after he was released from prison? Getting Past Iqbal Why did the United States Supreme Court find that Iqbal could not use Ashcroft and other high officials for this mistreatment? Why did this pose the real possibility that even if he were to sue lower level officials that they would be qualified immunity? What would be necessary to get to Ashcroft or others in DOJ? How is this like Rodney King? What was the Plan? What did Al-Kidd allege that got to Ashcroft without depending on vicarious liability? What is the key to cell for material witnesses? How do these Facts Support Al-Kidds Case that His Confinement was Pretextual? Al-Kidd’s arrest was sought a month after Al-Hussayen was indicted, and more than a year before trial began, temporally distant from the time any testimony would have been needed. The FBI had previously investigated and interviewed al-Kidd, but had never suggested, let alone demanded, that he appear as a witness. The FBI conducted lengthy interrogations with al-Kidd while in custody, including about matters apparently unrelated to Al-Hussayen’s alleged visa violations. Al-Kidd never actually testified for the prosecution in Al-Hussayen’s or any other case, despite his assurances that he would be willing to do so. Ashcroft’s immediate subordinate, FBI Director Mueller, testified before Congress that al-Kidd’s arrest (rather than, say, the obtaining of the evidence he was supposedly going to provide against Al-Hussayen) constituted a “major success[ ]” in “identifying and dismantling terrorist networks.” Should there be Immunity? Why no absolute (prosecutorial) immunity? What about qualified immunity? Ashcroft alternatively contends that if we conclude that the use of material witness orders for investigatory purposes violates the Constitution, we should st

文档评论(0)

gshshxx + 关注
实名认证
内容提供者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档