- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
People Search Engines.ppt
People Search Engines Ingmar Weber Email: ... find it via http://scifi.epfl.ch Joint work with Adish Singla Demo of people search engines Google address search (US only) Intelius background check (US only) Who’s who (25,000 big guys only) Business web (linkedin, xing, certain websites) Social networks++ (myspace, friendster, wikipedia, xanga, …) User contributed (tags, wikipedia, user added) Database community (VLDB, SIGMOD, CIDR, ..) More: spock, pipl, isihighlycited, csbib, scirus, … A “Scientist Finder” (SciFi) Why I work on this: I simply enjoy building (working) systems Good to stay in touch with Web 2.0 and all that Interesting to do (simple) web mining A good way to improve “visibility” Part of a bigger plan … Outline Starting point Why to search for a person Why/how is people search different Efficiency How long are users willing to wait How to make things (reasonably) efficient Result Quality What makes our life easy What makes our life hard Concrete Examples Case 1: Finding a good picture Case 2: Finding the (approximate) birth year Software Design Things we got right Things we’d get right next time Why to search for a person? Vanity “Digital mirror” Who is he/she? Search for unknown author Contact information (email) address Devoted fan “britney spears” It’s fun Does the machine “know” your friends? Why is people search different? What goes in (different sources) social networks, phone books, personal homepages What comes out (fact extraction) address, age, photo, homepage url What goes down (unforgiving users) facts are either wrong or right, wrong picture is “major disaster”, offended by age or # publications How long will users wait? It depends on the setting Information retrieval without feedback About 2 seconds are still tolerable Information retrieval with feedback Up to about 15 seconds is ok “A study on tolerable waiting time: how long are web users willing to wait?”, Fiona Fui-Hoon Nah, Journal of Behavior Information Technology, 2004, vol
您可能关注的文档
- Goals, Objectives, & Diversity.ppt
- Google Ajax Search API.ppt
- Google and YouTube.ppt
- Google MapReduce.ppt
- Google Scholar and the UML.ppt
- Google Search TipsAdvanced Features.ppt
- Google Search.ppt
- Google Sketch-Up Tutorial.ppt
- Governance.ppt
- GPS Rover.ppt
- Politics in Britain.ppt
- Population and Urbanization.ppt
- POSTPARTUM DEPRESSION BEYOND THE BLUES.ppt
- PowerPoint® Presentation for Dental Office Management.ppt
- Pressure sensors and thermistors.ppt
- Pressures in UK HealthcareChallenges for the NHS.ppt
- Principal Professional DevelopmentSummer 2006.ppt
- Problogging.ppt
- Process Mapping & Value Stream Mapping.ppt
- Processor Types And Instruction Sets.ppt
最近下载
- 家用电器行业市场前景及投资研究报告:小米家电业务复盘.pdf VIP
- 2025中小学学校教材教辅征订管理工作方案.docx VIP
- 城市轨道交通信号常见故障及应急处理.docx VIP
- 2024秋新部编人教版5五年级上册《道德与法治》全册优秀课件.docx VIP
- 幼儿园日管控周排查月调度工作制度.docx VIP
- 《序篇-不忘初心》课件-2023-2024学年高中音乐人音版音乐鉴赏.pptx VIP
- NB_T 20038-2011 核空气和气体处理规范 设计和制造通用要求.pdf VIP
- 新世纪大学英语综合教程第二版第一册教程.pdf VIP
- 危险化学品运输、装卸安全管理制度(5页).doc VIP
- 融通集团社招笔试题型.pdf
文档评论(0)