情谊行为若干问题的研究.docVIP

华中科技大学硕士学位论文第三部分是笔者对情谊行为的几个疑问。在这部分中，笔者重点阐述了情谊行为与法律行为、事实行为之间的区别，明确了情谊行为不是法律行为，也不是事实行为，最后还对情谊行为的施惠人能否主张不当得利和无因管理提出了自己的观点。第四部分是情谊行为之损害赔偿责任分析。笔者在这部分中明确指出了情谊行为之损害赔偿责任并非违约责任，它只能是侵权责任，并对情谊侵权行为的制度构建提出了自己的观点。第五部分是情谊行为在未来民法典中的地位和价值。在最后一部分，笔者展望了情谊行为在未来民法典中的价值，即便不能对情谊行为作出详尽的立法，也希望能明确情谊侵权行为的相关规定。通过以上的论述，笔者对情谊行为理论有了一个大致的勾画，其中既有纯理论的探讨，也不乏关于情谊行为在实践中如何运用的现实摸索。当然，受笔者的能力和知识所限，本文对情谊行为的研究尚有许多不妥之处，有待完善。但笔者仍然希望这篇文章能为情谊行为理论的发展作出一点贡献。关键字：情谊行为意思表示损害赔偿责任II华中科技大学硕士学位论文Abstract“Apromiseisapromise.”Gentleman’sagreementisverycommonindailylifeespeciallyChinaasamoralbelievingcountry.Gentleman’sagreementplaysaveryimportantroleevenexistsbroaderthancontactbehavior.I.e.aunclepromiseanephewtobuyhimacomputerafterhisuniversityentrance,aneighboraskanotherneighbortolookafterherchildetc.However,willtheyreallykeepthepromisewithoralagreement?Afterthe“commondailythings”aresorted,itiseasilytofindthatthesebehaviorsproducedreasonablythough,thegentlemanwhomakesthepromisewillneverwantorrealizetheywillbesuedforbreakingsuchpromise.Yet,these“commondailythings”maybringconflictsinourlife.Asmentioned,forsomereasontheuncledoesn’tkeephispromise,thechildgethurtwhilelookedafterbytheneighbor.Nowthequestionis:shouldthepromise-makingsideresponsibleforit?Whatistheevidencefortakingtheresponsibility?Sofarineitherourtheoryorabroad,attentionscannotbefoundtosuchout-of-lawbehavior,whichbringsgreatdifficultyinjudicialcase.Thejudgespendslotsoftimeinhandlingit.Therefore,thewriterresearchesthecommonexisting“gentleman’sagreement”indailylife,tryingtofingeroutitsessenceanditsboundarywithlaw.Herethe“gentleman’sagreement”iswhatProfessorMedicusfromGermancalledGefalligkeitenwhileChinaTaiwanMrWangZejiancalledKindnesshelp.Itdoesn’thaveaspecificdefinitionfromlaw,letalonesystematismofacademicresearchorlegislation.(Inaconvenientway,thewritercalleditGefalligkeitenforshort.)Thus,itisnecessarytomakearesearchonthistopicinordertoperfecttherelativetheoryofGefalligkeiten,alsotooffersupportforjudicialcase.HerewewillstartfromthebellowingfivepartsonGefall