仲裁合意的考察——以日本仲裁法为中心.pdfVIP

仲裁合意的考察—以日本仲裁法为中心 内容摘要 进入 21 世纪，随着全球经济一体化的不断深入发展，各国间的贸易越来越频繁， 贸易额也越来越大。由于国家对对方国家管辖权的认可态度的不同，以及仲裁迅速性、 专业性、保密性等优势，当贸易纷争产生时，企业间一般采取仲裁的方式解决纷争。中 国与日本之间不存在相互承认对方裁判所或法院的条约，但在中日建交时，于1974 年1 月5 日签订了《中日两国贸易协定》，其中第8 条第2 款明确了通过仲裁解决贸易纷争 的方式。同时，两国也都是《纽约公约》的加盟国，在相互承认与执行仲裁判决中不存 在程序与法律上的问题。而在仲裁的实际操作过程中，中日两国仲裁制度之间存在多大 差异呢？本文以仲裁合意为出发点，具体分析仲裁合意的定义、仲裁合意的性质以及仲 裁合意的有效构成要件。来比较两国仲裁制度的不同。由于中国《仲裁法》的修改已经 提上了修改日程，并且根据研究显示，其修改将很大程度上参考日本《仲裁法》，因此 对日本仲裁合意进行研究，可以为我国《仲裁法》的修改提供参考。 关键词： 仲裁合意；法律性质；构成要件；有效性 1 Abstract With development of global economic integration carrying on in the 21st century, transaction between countries becomes more frequent and the volume of trade is also growing. Due to the different attitude towards national jurisdiction between countries and the rapidness, speciality and confidentiality of arbitration, enterprises tend to settle the disputes via arbitration when trade disputes arise. There is no official treaty which recognizes each other’s arbitration institute or court between China and Japan. However in term 2 of article 8 in bilateral trade agreement between China and Japan, which was signed when diplomatic relation established in January 5th 1974, arbitration is clearly defined as a dispute settlement method. At the same time, both of the countries are the members of the New York convention which reduces the legal and procedure obstacles of recognizing and enforcing the arbitral award from each other. But how much difference are there in the arbitration systems of China and Japan in process of arbitration practice ？ From the investigation of arbitration agreement, this paper conducts a specific analysis of the definition, the nature and the legal element