- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
复旦大学顾十论文
ABSTRACT
The paper,regarding the anti—monopoly regulation process as the major idea,
makes an evaluation on institutionalized defects ofregulation based on the procedural
regulation value setting after differential comparison.As for institutiormlized defects,
the paper,paying削l resp02t to the objective law of the development of
telecommunication and information technology,not only parses the intemal
mechanism that China’s anti-monopoly regulation of telecommunication should be
distinct from that of traditional economic powers with a sound legal system such as
United States due to that regulation is ahead of legislation in China,but also puts
forward some critiques on the randomness of regulation and uncertainty of industrial
growth which results from the caprice of value—setting of regulatory policy,thereby
expounding further the iucompleteness of China’s anti—monopoly regulation of
telecommunication from the perspective ofuncertainty ofthe law.The author has no
intention to criticize the uncertainty of the lave,because in China it is the unwarranted
worries toward it that make us lack the boldness to pass the suitable anti-monopoly
law and telecommunieation law诵tll the consequence of losing gradually the
deserved time value of the law due to the hesitation.On the contrary,the author
argues tllat the inherent value of the uneertainty of law shouid be deservedly
considered.though we shouldn’t abuse its value with the consequence of the law
enforcement undermined.11地paper endeavors to provide a route between t11e
fundamental uncertainty of law and the certainty of law锄forcement.which
synchronizes as much as possible the legal process of China’s anti-monopoly
regulation of telecommuaication with that of western advanced countries with a
mature market economv.m value of the sync lies in not only standardizing the
domestic telecommunication markeL but also providing a defensive cushion on
legislation for protecting national industry and consumers while overseas
原创力文档


文档评论(0)