- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
慢性前列腺炎患者健康促进生活方式调查及影响因素分析.doc
慢性前列腺炎患者健康促进生活方式调查及影响因素分析
[摘要] 目的 分析慢性前列腺炎患者健康促进生活方式及影响因素。 方法 选择慢性前列腺炎患者120例为调查对象,采用健康促进生活方式量表对患者进行调查,并分析影响患者健康促进生活方式的相关因素。 结果 患者健康促进生活方式评分(120.4±21.7)分,远低于满分208分,说明慢性前列腺患者总体健康促进生活方式较差。其中营养维度得分最高为(26.9±5.7)分,其次为健康责任(24.8±6.9)分,体力活动得分最低为(14.3±5.2)分。单因素分析结果显示患者文化程度高、患病时间长、独居、性生活满意、人均收入高者其健康促进生活方式评分较高(P0.01)。多因素分析结果显示患者文化程度越高、性生活满意程度高、经济状况好者其健康促进生活方式越好(P0.01)。 结论 慢性前列腺炎患者健康促进生活方式总体较差,患者的文化程度、性生活满意度以及经济状况是影响患者采取健康促进生活方式的主要因素。
[关键词] 健康促进生活方式;慢性前列腺炎;影响因素
[中图分类号] R697.3 [文献标识码] B [文章编号] 1673-9701(2015)16-0074-03
[Abstract] Objective To analyze influence factors of health-promoting lifestyles of patients with chronic prostatitis (CP). Methods One hundred and twenty cases with CP were selected, who were researched by health-promoting lifestyles scales, and related factors which influenced health-promoting lifestyles were analyzed as well. Results Health-promoting lifestyles score of patients was (120.4±21.7), which was much lower than full score (208 scores), and were showed that, total health-promoting lifestyles of patients with CP was bad, and whose nutritional dimension score was the highest (26.9±5.7), health responsibility came second (24.8±6.9), and the physical activities score was the lowest (14.3±5.2). The single-factor analysis result were showed that, health-promoting lifestyles scores of patients with high educational level, long-term disease duration, living alone, satisfactory of sexual life and high per-capita income were high (P0.01), while multi-factor analysis result showed that, educational level, satisfactory of sexual life, financial situation and disease duration came into regression equation, and the higher educational level, high satisfactory of sexual life and better financial situation, made the better health-promoting lifestyles. Conclusion The overall health-promoting lifestyles of patients with CP are bad, and the educational level, satisfactory of sexual life and financial situation are the main factors to influence patients to
文档评论(0)