- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
健康教育论文:句容市农村居民健康素养读现况与提高策略的研究
健康教育论文:句容市农村居民健康素养现况与提高策略的研究
【中文摘要】:本研究通过对句容市农村居民健康知识与态度、健康生活方式与行为、健康技能等健康素养相关知识、理念、行为、技能的基线调查和干预后调查,拟了解句容市农村居民健康素养持有的现状和干预效果,评价全民健康教育对农村群众健康素养的影响,为探寻农村居民健康素养提高策略提供依据。方法:采用多阶段分层随机抽样方法确定监测对象,利用《2009中国公民健康素养调查问卷》,在基线调查的基础上,以健康知识资料入户、健康咨询巡展巡讲、媒体宣传密集覆盖等方式,对农村居民集中开展8个月左右的高频率、高覆盖的干预后,进行效果评价。此后继续常规性宣教干预1年后,利用《2010中国公民健康素养调查问卷》对其中相同健康素养持有情况进行对比分析,评价干预后健康素养持有的稳定性效果。结果:基线调查518人,8个月集中干预后健康知识与理念知晓率由50.71%提高到67.50%,健康行为形成率由51.03%提高到61.56%,基本健康技能的掌握也有了明显的提升,差异均有统计学意义(P0.05);干预前后对比,科学健康观、传染病防治、慢性病防治、基本医疗、安全急救五个方面素养都有提高,差异均有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论:短期密集式的健康教育干预能有效改变农村居民健康观念、提高健康知识知晓率,但知识率的巩固、健康行为的形成、健康技能的掌握需长期坚持不懈,才能促进公民健康素养的不断提高。
【英文摘要】: In this study, the health knowledge and attitudes of rural residents, their healthy lifestyle and behavior, their health literacy skills and other health-related knowledge, beliefs, behaviors, skills were investigated at baseline, and the interventions including national health education was carried out to understand the status of health literacy and effectiveness of the interventions among rural residents in Jurong city, to evaluate the effect of national health education on health literacy. This study will provide a basis for improving strategies of the health literacy of rural residents.Methods: Stratified multistage randomized sampling method was used to select monitoring objects, on the basis of the baseline investigation by using the” 2009 China citizen health literacy questionnaire”, a eight- month抯 intensive intervention was administered among the subjects by various health education activities including household propaganda, lecture, and media propaganda about health knowledge, and then the effectiveness of intervention was evalua对ted. A routine intervention was continued for one year, and comparision for holding same health literacy among subjects was conducted between two investigations to evaluate stable effect of holding health literacy, the investigation was conducted according to “ 2010 China citizen health literacy questionnaire”.Results:
文档评论(0)