保妇康栓用于LEEP刀治疗重度宫颈糜烂术后康复的作用分析.docVIP

保妇康栓用于LEEP刀治疗重度宫颈糜烂术后康复的作用分析.doc

  1. 1、本文档共8页,可阅读全部内容。
  2. 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
  3. 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  4. 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  5. 5、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  6. 6、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  7. 7、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  8. 8、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
保妇康栓用于LEEP刀治疗重度宫颈糜烂术后康复的作用分析   【摘要】目的:探讨高频电波刀宫颈电环切除术(LEEP术)联合保妇康栓治疗宫颈糜烂的疗效及安全性。方法:选取我院妇产科2012年1月至2013年8月收治的重度宫颈糜烂患者138例,随机分为观察组和对照组各69例,两组患者均采用LEEP刀治疗,观察组在LEEP刀术后加用保妇康栓。观察比较两组患者的治愈率、有效率以及出现的不良反应等。结果:8周后,观察组患者中,治愈62例,有效6例,无效1例;对照组患者中,治愈45例,有效17例,无效7例。观察组患者治疗显效率和总有效率均明显高于对照组,两组比较差异有显著性(P0.05);观察组术后阴道出血时间、脱痂期出血量、术后感染、愈合时间的情况均明显优于对照组(P0.05)。结论:LEEP刀联合保妇康栓治疗重度宫颈糜烂的临床效果好,不良反应发生率低,术后情况良好,值得在实际中推广应用。   【关键词】LEEP刀;保妇康栓;宫颈糜烂   Efficacy and safety of LEEP combined with Baofukang suppository in the treatment of severe cervical erosionLIU Jianyong1, ZHANG Jin2. 1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Maternal and Child Health Hospital, Jinhua 322000, China; 2. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology,Taizhou Municipal Hospital, Taizhou 318000,China   【Abstract】Objectives: To investigate the efficacy and safety of the loop electrosurgical excision (LEEP) combined with Baofukang suppository in the treatment of cervical erosion. Methods: The 138 patients with severe cervical erosion who received treatment in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology of our hospital between January 2012 and August 2013 were selected and randomly divided into observation group and control group with 69 cases in each group. Patients in both groups were treated with LEEP, and Baofukang suppository was used for patients in the observation group. The cure rate, efficiency and adverse reactions of the 2 groups were observed and compared. Results: 8 weeks later, for patients in the observation group, 62 cases were cured, 6 cases effective and 1 case ineffective; for patients in the control group, 45 cases were cured, 17 cases effective and 7 cases ineffective. The significant efficiency rate and total effective rate of patients in the observation group were higher than those of the control group, with significant difference between the 2 groups (P0.05); the postoperative vaginal bleeding time, amount of bleeding during decrustation period, postoperative infection and healing time of the observ

文档评论(0)

guan_son + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档