MultiValued Logic Synthesis多值逻辑综合.pptVIP

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
MultiValued Logic Synthesis多值逻辑综合

Binary Recursion Tree The recursive Shannon expansion corresponds to a binary recursion tree Example: Path ?(v) to node v corresponds to cube c?(v) Example: c?(v) = x1 x2 x3 Binary Recursion Tree The root represents the original function f. Each node v corresponds to fc?(v). If ever fc?(v) = 1 or 0 we can terminate the tree and replace v by 1 or 0. Such a node v is a leaf. Example Implicit Enumeration - Branch and Bound Checking for tautology and many other theoretically intractable problems (co-NP complete) can be effectively solved using implicit enumeration: use recursive Shannon expansion to explore Bn. In (hopefully) large subspaces of Bn, prune the binary recursion tree by exploiting properties of the node function fc?(v) exploiting heuristic bounding techniques even though in the worst case the recursion tree may have 2n nodes, in practice (in many cases), we typically encounter a linear number of nodes Implicit Enumeration - Branch and Bound Thus we say that the 2n min-terms of f have been implicitly enumerated BDD’s (Binary Decision Diagrams) are alternate representations in which implicit enumeration is performed statically, and nodes with identical path cofactors are identified (very important – we will discuss BDDs later!) Example This is not a tautology. In testing for tautology, we look for a cube subspace c such that fc=0. If we can find it then f is not the tautology. Can rule out complete cube subspace c’ if fc’=1 Tautology can be proved by finding {ci} such that ? ci = 1 and fci ? 1 for all ci. We don’t need that ci cj =?. Definition 1 A function f : Bn ? B is positive unate in variable xi iff This is equivalent to monotone increasing in xi: for all min-term pairs (m-, m+) where For example, m-3=1001, m+3=1011(where i=3) Similarly for negative unate monotone decreasing: A function is unate in xi if it is either positive unate or negative unate in xi. Definition 2 A function is unate if it is una

文档评论(0)

118books + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档