原创力文档The persistence of low expectations in special education law viewed through the lens of therapeutic jurisprudence.pdfVIP
- 1、本文档共23页，可阅读全部内容。
- 2、原创力文档（book118）网站文档一经付费（服务费），不意味着购买了该文档的版权，仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用，不得用于商业用途，未经授权，严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等，侵权必究。
- 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传，本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺！文档内容仅供研究参考，付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费，意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险，本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务；查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档，您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等，请点击“版权申诉”（推荐），也可以打举报电话：400-050-0827(电话支持时间：9:00-18:30)。
- 5、该文档为VIP文档，如果想要下载，成为VIP会员后，下载免费。
- 6、成为VIP后，下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后，不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 7、成为VIP后，您将拥有八大权益，权益包括：VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 8、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传，每下载1次， 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等，对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
The persistence of low expectations in special education law viewed through the lens of therapeutic jurisprudence.pdf
International Journal of Law and Psychiatry 33 (2010) 375–397
Contents lists available at ScienceDirect
International Journal of Law and Psychiatry
The persistence of low expectations in special education law viewed through the lens of therapeutic jurisprudence
Richard Peterson
Pepperdine University School of Law, United States
article info
Keywords: Low expectations Children disabilities Education Therapeutic
abstract
For more than thirty-?ve years a paradigm of low expectations has infected efforts to educate children with disabilities and has been a persistent and stubborn obstacle to the successful implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), and its predecessor, the Education of All Handicapped Children Act (EAHCA). This dilemma raises questions addressed in this paper: What is meant by low expectations in the context of Special Education Law? What are the root causes of this phenomenon, and what makes it so resistant to change? How does it impede implementation of the IDEA? And lastly, in what ways does the paradigm of low expectations impact children with disabilities socially, emotionally, and psychologically? The primary purpose of this paper is to consider these questions, particularly the last, utilizing therapeutic jurisprudence (TJ), a theoretical lens through which the emotional and psychological impact of the law and its processes upon those who interact in its context may be viewed and analyzed.
? 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction
The Education for All Handicapped Children Act (EAHCA), Public Law 94–142, was enacted in 1975.1 Amending the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965,2 this statute represented a major shift in educational public policy with its primary purpose to “assure that all handicapped children have available to them … a free appropriate public education which emphasizes special education and related services designed to meet their unique needs….”3 This change marked the ?rst
您可能关注的文档
- Spherical contact mechanical analysis of roller cone drill bits journal bearing.pdf
- Spherical polymeric brushes viewed as soft colloidal particles zero-shear viscosity.pdf
- Spin chains viewed as the fermionic parts of supersymmetric quantum mechanical models.pdf
- Spin current induced by a charged tip in a quantum point contact.pdf
- Sputter deposition of Sn-doped ZnOAgSn-doped ZnO transparent contact layer for GaN LED applications.pdf
- Stability of contact discontinuity for 1-D compressible viscous micropolar fluid model.pdf
- Stability study on a novel micro structure configuration of cathode contact layer for solid oxide fuel cell stack.pdf
- Stable glycopyrronium bromide solid contact ion selective potentiometric sensors using multi-walled carbon nanotubes, polyaniline nanoparticles and polyaniline microparticles as ion-to-electron transd.pdf
- Static analysis of XML security views and query rewriting.pdf
- Statistical models of nearly complete elastic rough surface contact-comparison with numerical solutions.pdf
文档评论（0）