GMAT写作Argument满分范文分析-智课教育.pdfVIP

智 课 网 G M A T 备 考 资料 GMAT写作Argument满分范文分析-智课教育 GMAT写作Argument是GMAT考试中最能反映考生语言表达和思 路的一个单项，备考初期，考生需要学习一些优秀范文来提升自己的写 作能力。接下来，小编为大家带来GMAT写作Argument满分范文分析 ，希望对大家的GMAT写作备考有帮助。 原题：The following appeared in the editorial section of a local newspaper: In the first four years that Montoya has served as mayor of the city of San Perdito, the population has decreased and the unemployment rate has increased. Two businesses have closed for each new business that has opened. Under Varro, who served as mayor for four years before Montoya, the unemployment rate decreased and the population increased. Clearly, the residents of San Perdito would be best served if they voted Montoya out of office and reelected Varro. Discuss how well reasoned ... etc.更多相关内容请点击》GMAT写作Argument如何锦上添花。 翻译：地方性报纸的编者按： 在Montoya当San Perdito市长的头4年里，人口下降而失业率上 升。每当一个新企业开业，就有两个旧的关门。而在Montoya之前Varr o当市长的4年里，失业率下降人口增长。很明显，San Perdito的居民重新选举Varro而非Montoya会得到更好的服务。 范文赏析： The recommendation endorsed in this argument is that residents of San Perdito vote current mayor Montoya out of office, and re-elect former mayor Varro. The reasons cited are that during Montoyas four years in office the population has decreased while unemployment has increased, whereas during Varros term unemployment declined while the population grew. This argument involves the sort of gross oversimplification and emotional appeal typical of political rhetoric; for this reason it is unconvincing. 更多相关内容请点击》GMAT写作正确步骤分析。 First of all, the author assumes that the Montoya administration caused the unemployment in San Perdito as well as its population loss. The line of reasoning is that because Montoya was elected before the rise in unemployment and the decline in population, the former event caused the latter. But this is fallacious reasoning unless other possible causal explanations have been considered and ruled out. For example, perhaps a statewide or nationwide recession is the cause of these events. Or perhaps the current economic downturn is part