CU-Fix IUD and Clinical Comparison in TCu380A.docVIP

 PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 8 CU-Fix IUD and Clinical Comparison in TCu380A [Abstract] Objective CU-Fix and TCu380A IUD were each other to compare contraceptive efficacy and side effects. Methods A prospective random distribution of subjects receiving 200 cases. Results 60 months after the CU-Fix IUD continuation rate 0.97 than TCu380A IUD 0.82, the difference was statistically significant (P lt;0.01); loss rates were slightly lower than 0.10 to 0.01, the difference between them was significant (P lt;0.01); with the device removed for medical reasons after the rate TCu380A IUD is 0.06 higher than the CU-Fix IUD 0.01, difference between the two was not significant (Pgt; 0.05); with the device after the apparent rate of side effects of CU-Fix IUD 0.20 0.05 less than TCu380A, the difference was very significant sex (P lt;0.01), CU-Fix IUD in 1 case after 3 months with the device occurs when the ectopic pregnancy, and TCu380A IUD device in 2 patients with intrauterine pregnancy, but no significant difference between the two. Conclusions of new house CU-Fix IUD within the IUD contraceptive effect, adverse reactions and safety are better than TCu380A IUD. Keywords:] CU-FixIUD; Tcu380A IUD; comparative analysis Intrauterine device (TUD) is an effective, long-lasting, easy, safe birth control measures, the vast majority of women of childbearing age still use this method, the current contraceptive. But a long time, usually a single metal ring, birth control not effective , the current direction of development is the inclusion of active substances in the TUD, trace to increase the contraceptive effect of constant release, and by changing the form of IUD, reduce side effects and adverse reactions. The Institute as a WHO (World Health Organization) 10 in China center clinical trial, participants completed a new IUD CU-Fix issue with TCu380A clinical comparative study, now 5-year clinical data are summarized below. 1 Materials and methods 1.1 Structure and propertie