Drain on the core technology enterprises Shengxing Korea high-generation LCD plant in China investment or obstructed.docVIP

 PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 6 Drain on the core technology enterprises Shengxing Korea high-generation LCD plant in China investment or obstructed Recently, with LG Display, Samsung Electronics, the two giants in China, investment in high-generation LCD panel plant planned the ‘exposure’, in South Korea sparked a lot of controversy. In response, South Korean Knowledge Economy Ministry official said: ‘In order to take the world’s largest TV market - China From EMKT. mainland China, it is inevitable. However, the core technology LCD panel is likely to flow abroad. ‘ Is only an excuse The Chinese mainland market for Sharp, AU Optronics, Chi Mei, BOE panel giants such as the high-generation lines are being staged investment contest, the two giants to express different opinions, said: ‘Any further delay the timing, then the market will be Japan and the China Taiwan companies to seize. ‘ However, according to South Korean media reported that within the relevant government agencies in South Korea to hold those who view the above officials and a minority. The relevant government officials on the two companies enter the China market, regarding the position panel, said: ‘Basically, they will protect free enterprise and economic activity, but the outflow of core technologies are indeed worrying. ‘ In accordance with legal provisions related to Korea, Korean enterprises to invest abroad LCD, semiconductor and other advanced technology-related factories, must be approved by the Government. However, indications that the core technology concerned that the outflow may be just a beautiful excuse for hope that the two giants in China to expand investment and job creation are some government officials ‘deliberate’. It is reported that two South Korean companies in China to master to build LCD panel plant to vote final approval of the right of the prime minister’s office, still in the Sejong City, the controversy over the planning amendments and whirlpools. The solution will be rel