Form 36 ankle surgery in the diagnosis and treatment of.docVIP

 PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 21 Form 36 ankle surgery in the diagnosis and treatment of [Keywords:] entry Short Form ankle surgical disease Effective assessment tool is an important means of assessing efficacy. And most of the currently used scoring systems are assessed by a doctor, subjective, and its inherent bias exists. Fracture healing is not the same in patients with good function, by the patient’s own evaluation of the treatment effect is a higher level of therapeutic effect [1,2]. the method of treatment of patients judged the efficacy to improve the objectivity of the assessment, and many more emphasis on the evaluation criteria were incorporated into the score of subjective feelings system [3]. studies have shown that the evaluation of patients on treatment with high reliability and accuracy [4]. From 1991 to 2001 to compare six orthopedic influential magazine showed that patients judge scale application of treatment increased significantly, from 8% to 18%, of which the most widely used is the Short Form 36 (36-item short form, SF-36) [5]. SF-36 quality of life measurement scale, and the functional status of foot and ankle will determine the scope and form of human activity is an important guarantee for the quality of life, SF-36 can therefore reflect the treatment effect of foot and ankle disorders, it has been widely used in foot assessment of the therapeutic effect of ankle disease. 1 SF-36 and scoring the content SF-36 Medical Outcomes Study Group in the United States the development of a universal quality of life measurement scales. It has been shown to be effective and is the most widely used health survey questionnaire [6]. Chinese version of SF-36 also to achieve greater results [7 ~ 9], but they are version 1. In order to reduce the “ceiling effect” and the “floor effect”, Ware et al [10] also developed the 2 SF-36, version 1 than change, leading to scale measurements in some dimensions vary with the version 1 (Table 1). SF-36 different l