商主体层级立体结构的实然状况与应然分析——quot;企业集团quot;涉诉困境的追问与反思.pdfVIP

第 28 号在第川期 Vol. 28 , No. 11 河北法学 2010 年 11 月 Hebei Law Science Nov. , 20 1 0 商主体层级立体结构的实然状况与应然分析 一一一企业集团涉诉困境的追问与反思 范伟红 (西南政法大学民商法学院，重庆 400031 ) 摘 要:当前商体理论在廓清商:È体的边界和体系上再在建火不足，更欠缺商主体的立体构成描液，商 主体范围过于狭窄并出现诸如企业集团等灰色主体，企业集团可以从事部分商事行为，但涉诉后 的商主体地位.诉讼主体地位尴尬不明，既不能满足商事交易需要，也不能公平公正解决商事纠 纷。从应然性的层面分析，法经济学的交易成本理论解释了商主体样态的多元化需求，管理学中 的价值链理论解释了商主体立体构成的客观性。从实然状况看，大慧出现的企业集团以及从事商 事行为的必要性、普遍性和现实性要求商法赋予其商主体地位，而不宜继续保留这些灰色主体。 关键词:商京体;企业集团;实然性;应然性 中图分类寄: DF59 文献标识码: A 文革编号: 1002-3933(2010) 11 -0029咱7 The Necessity and Reality of the Three-dimensional Structure of the Business Subject --The reflection on the dilemma of Corporate Group action FAN Wei-hong ( Civil and Commercial Law School , Southwest University of Political Science and Law ,Chongqing 400031 China) Abstract:There are significant deficiencies in delimiting the boundalγand system of the theories of the commercial en1Ïty , but also in the three-dimensional form description. The scope of business subject is too narrow , meanwhile , some enterprise groups which are called the gray entity have emerged. Enterprise groups can participate in part of the commercial acts , but the commercial action being taken , the dominant position of the commercial entity and litigation are embarrassing , which cannot meet the needs of commercial transactions , nor can settl