商事仲裁视野下的枉法裁决罪.pdfVIP

第27 卷第 12 期 Vol. 27. No. 12 河北法学 Hebei Lαw Science 2009 年 12 月 Dec..2009 : 商事仲裁视野下的枉法裁决罪 ! 范铭超 (上海政法学院，上海 201701) 摘 .:全国人大常委会通过《刑法修正案(六)).规定了何法裁决稚。该条文具有规抱仲裁活动、维护仲裁市场、推进仲 裁发展的积极作用。 jßJ幸在内容和l 影响 k均ff夜诸多值得赁疑之处。其内容，在主体方丽，存在东体范倒不明 确、1:体定性与{仲裁法》冲突、共同犯罪时可能搬导H1不合情愿结论的问题;:{E客观要件方丽，存，(f.条文措碎有 误、号有关.ìI.t*存在~辆_.f屑、与同际ltJ原则存在冲突、不符合仲裁法律i运用以则和趋势、无法协调与俞意裁决关 系的问题η 其影响，存在;11 超法院院督极不当扩张.动摇仲裁族础;变相赋予法院实体审钱权，导致我国违背网际 条约义务:缺乏科学性，磁坏仲裁市场;错误定性，危害我网仲裁向誉的不良影响。为保证平时在成仲裁的健康发 展，应从仲裁刑事资任、仲裁民事责任、仲裁行业规范二方副入手，构建究，庭街效的仲裁责任制度。 关键询:仲裁;枉法裁决罪;仲裁员贫任制度 中图分2挂号: DF62 文献标识码:A 文章编号: 1002-3933(2佣的12-0 125 制 Crime of Misuse of Law in Adjudication under the Vision of Commercial Arbitration FAN Ming-chao (Shanghai University of Political Science and Law. Shanghai 201701 China) Abstrad; The Pωple s Congress has made the Amendment VI to the Criminal Law 0/ the People s Republic 0/ China. in which people conducting arbitration cωntravening law shall be consider叫剧 a crime. On the positíve síde. it re肌dates arbitration. maintains the stabilíty of arbitration industry as well as promot制 the development of arbitration. However. the contenls and the inßuence of il are in controversy. In order 10 achieve the healthy development of arbitration. responsibility in the criminal 嗣pecl. civil 嗣pect as well as industrial aspect must be considered. An integraled legal f