乳腺癌术后持续负压引流和加压包扎引流的对比.pdfVIP

.571. ~.露营2疆 2013 年5 月第20 卷第5 期 ·论著· (临床研究) 乱腺癌术后持续负压寻l流和加压包扎寻l流的对比 陈由海，陈敏东 (广州市第一人民医院心胸外科，广东广州 510180) {摘要1 目的通过对手L腺癌术后持续负压引流和加压包扎引流的比较，分析两种不同引流方式的疗效及术后并发症情况。 方法回顾性分析我院自 2008 年2 月至 2010 年 11 月在我院收治并实施乳腺癌手术的患者52 例，将其分为治疗组与对照纽各 26 例3 治疗组患者采取持续负压引流进行术后治疗，对照纽患者采取加压包扎引流进行术后治疗:定期对所有患者术后身体指标进 行检测c 结果治疗组患者舒适例数较对照纽患者明显增多且无明显皮下积液等并发症出现。结论乳腺癌术后采取持续负压引流 较加压包扎引流疗效明显，且持续负压引jyt过程简单，操作方便，对患者术后恢复无明显影响，对临床治疗有积极作用。 [关键词] 乳腺癌;持续负压引流法;加压包扎引流法;并发症 中图分类号: R737.9 文献标识码: A doi: 1O.3969/j.issn.1674-4659.20 13.05.057 1 Comparison Between Continuous Negative Pressure Drainage and Compression Bandage Drainage After Breast Cancer Operation CHEN Quhai, CHEN Mindong (Department ofCordiothor配ic Surgery, Guangzhou First People s Hospit aJ, Guoogzhou 510180, China) [Abstract] Objective To explore the e仔ects and postoperative complications of continuous negative pressure drainage and compression bandage drainage after breast cancer operation. Methods 52 patients with breast cancer operation in our hospital 企om February 2008 to November 2010 were analyzed retrospectively and divided into two grou肘， with 26 cases in each group. The treatment group received the cOntinuOus negative pressure drainage , while the control group received the compression bandage drainage. The physical indicators after the operation were monitored on time. Results The cases of patients with comfortable feeling in the treatment grOup were higher 由an that of the cOntrol group, and no ObviOus subcutaneous effusion was found. Conclusions The continuous negative pressure d